Convergent Deduction for Probabilistic Logic

03/27/2013
by   Peter Haddawy, et al.
0

This paper discusses the semantics and proof theory of Nilsson's probabilistic logic, outlining both the benefits of its well-defined model theory and the drawbacks of its proof theory. Within Nilsson's semantic framework, we derive a set of inference rules which are provably sound. The resulting proof system, in contrast to Nilsson's approach, has the important feature of convergence - that is, the inference process proceeds by computing increasingly narrow probability intervals which converge from above and below on the smallest entailed probability interval. Thus the procedure can be stopped at any time to yield partial information concerning the smallest entailed interval.

READ FULL TEXT

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 8

research
04/05/2018

A Proof of the Compositions of Time Interval Relations

We prove the 169 compositions of time interval relations. The proof is f...
research
03/27/2013

Summary of A New Normative Theory of Probabilistic Logic

By probabilistic logic I mean a normative theory of belief that explains...
research
05/08/2018

The interval number of a planar graph is at most three

The interval number of a graph G is the minimum k such that one can assi...
research
08/06/2021

Non-ground Abductive Logic Programming with Probabilistic Integrity Constraints

Uncertain information is being taken into account in an increasing numbe...
research
09/26/2021

Expected value of the smallest denominator in a random interval of fixed radius

We compute the probability mass function of the random variable which re...
research
01/15/2022

View-Based Owicki-Gries Reasoning for Persistent x86-TSO (Extended Version)

The rise of persistent memory is disrupting computing to its core. Our w...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset