Continual learning: A comparative study on how to defy forgetting in classification tasks

09/18/2019

∙

by   Matthias De Lange, et al.

∙

0

∙

share

Artificial neural networks thrive in solving the classification problem for a particular rigid task, where the network resembles a static entity of knowledge, acquired through generalized learning behaviour from a distinct training phase. However, endeavours to extend this knowledge without targeting the original task usually result in a catastrophic forgetting of this task. Continual learning shifts this paradigm towards a network that can continually accumulate knowledge over different tasks without the need for retraining from scratch, with methods in particular aiming to alleviate forgetting. We focus on task-incremental classification, where tasks arrive in a batch-like fashion, and are delineated by clear boundaries. Our main contributions concern 1) a taxonomy and extensive overview of the state-of-the-art, 2) a novel framework to continually determine stability-plasticity trade-off of the continual learner, 3) a comprehensive experimental comparison of 10 state-of-the-art continual learning methods and 4 baselines. We empirically scrutinize which method performs best, both on balanced Tiny Imagenet and a large-scale unbalanced iNaturalist datasets. We study the influence of model capacity, weight decay and dropout regularization, and the order in which the tasks are presented, and qualitatively compare methods in terms of required memory, computation time and storage.