Constructing a More Closely Matched Control Group in a Difference-in-Differences Analysis: Its Effect on History Interacting with Group Bias

09/15/2020
by   Pallavi Basu, et al.
0

Difference-in-differences analysis with a control group that differs considerably from a treated group is vulnerable to bias from historical events that have different effects on the groups. Constructing a more closely matched control group by matching a subset of the overall control group to the treated group may result in less bias. We study this phenomenon in simulation studies. We study the effect of mountaintop removal mining (MRM) on mortality using a difference-in-differences analysis that makes use of the increase in MRM following the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. For a difference-in-differences analysis of the effect of MRM on mortality, we constructed a more closely matched control group and found a 95% confidence interval that contains substantial adverse effects along with no effect and small beneficial effects.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
01/07/2019

Patterns of Effects and Sensitivity Analysis for Differences-in-Differences

Applied analysts often use the differences-in-differences (DID) method t...
research
06/19/2023

Subgroup Difference in Differences to Identify Effect Modification Without a Control Group

Suppose it is of interest to characterize effect heterogeneity of an int...
research
05/04/2020

Protocol for a Study of the Effect of Surface Mining in Central Appalachia on Adverse Birth Outcomes

Surface mining has become a major method of coal mining in Central Appal...
research
12/01/2019

The Effect of Real Estate Auction Events on Mortality Rate

This study has investigated the mortality rate of parties at real estate...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset