Conservative two-stage group testing

05/06/2020
by   Matthew Aldridge, et al.
0

Inspired by applications in testing for COVID-19, we consider a variant of two-stage group testing we call "conservative" two-stage testing, where every item declared to be defective must be definitively confirmed by being tested by itself in the second stage. We study this in the linear regime where the prevalence is fixed while the number of items is large. We study various nonadaptive test designs for the first stage, and derive a new lower bound for the total number of tests required. We find that a first-stage design with constant tests per item and constant items per test due to Broder and Kumar (arXiv:2004.01684) is extremely close to optimal. Simulations back up the theoretical results.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/15/2022

A negative binomial approximation in group testing

We consider the problem of group testing (pooled testing), first introdu...
research
12/16/2020

Group testing and PCR: a tale of charge value

The original problem of group testing consists in the identification of ...
research
01/25/2018

Individual testing is optimal for nonadaptive group testing in the linear regime

We consider nonadaptive probabilistic group testing in the linear regime...
research
05/30/2021

Improving Efficiency of Tests for Composite Null Hypotheses

The goal of mediation analysis is to study the effect of exposure on an ...
research
01/22/2019

Sparse Graph Codes for Non-adaptive Quantitative Group Testing

This paper considers the problem of quantitative group testing with a no...
research
11/23/2020

The Statistics of Noisy One-Stage Group Testing in Outbreaks

In one-stage or non-adaptive group testing, instead of testing every sam...
research
05/24/2022

Model-Based and Graph-Based Priors for Group Testing

The goal of the group testing problem is to identify a set of defective ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset