Conflict and Surprise: Heuristics for Model Revision

03/20/2013
by   Kathryn Blackmond Laskey, et al.
0

Any probabilistic model of a problem is based on assumptions which, if violated, invalidate the model. Users of probability based decision aids need to be alerted when cases arise that are not covered by the aid's model. Diagnosis of model failure is also necessary to control dynamic model construction and revision. This paper presents a set of decision theoretically motivated heuristics for diagnosing situations in which a model is likely to provide an inadequate representation of the process being modeled.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

research
03/06/2013

Knowledge-Based Decision Model Construction for Hierarchical Diagnosis: A Preliminary Report

Numerous methods for probabilistic reasoning in large, complex belief or...
research
05/22/2013

Towards Rational Deployment of Multiple Heuristics in A*

The obvious way to use several admissible heuristics in A* is to take th...
research
03/27/2013

When Should a Decision Maker Ignore the Advice of a Decision Aid?

This paper argues that the principal difference between decision aids an...
research
10/30/2018

Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied?

Paradoxically, bibliometric indicators (i.e., publications and citation ...
research
07/09/2018

Evaluating Active Learning Heuristics for Sequential Diagnosis

Given a malfunctioning system, sequential diagnosis aims at identifying ...
research
08/15/2018

Correct-by-construction Process Composition Using Classical Linear Logic Inference

The need for rigorous process composition is encountered in many situati...
research
08/15/2018

A Pragmatic, Scalable Approach to Correct-by-construction Process Composition Using Classical Linear Logic Inference

The need for rigorous process composition is encountered in many situati...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset