Computational Limitations in Robust Classification and Win-Win Results
share
We continue the study of computational limitations in learning robust classifiers, following the recent work of Bubeck, Lee, Price and Razenshteyn. First, we demonstrate classification tasks where computationally efficient robust classifiers do not exist, even when computationally unbounded robust classifiers do. We rely on the hardness of decoding problems with preprocessing on codes and lattices. Second, we show classification tasks where efficient robust classifiers exist, but they are computationally hard to learn. Bubeck et al. showed examples of such tasks in the small-perturbation regime where the robust classifier can recover from a constant number of perturbed bits. Indeed, as we observe, the question of whether a large-perturbation robust classifier for their task exists is related to important open questions in computational number theory. We show two such classification tasks in the large-perturbation regime: the first relies on the existence of one-way functions, a minimal assumption in cryptography; and the second on the hardness of the learning parity with noise problem. For the second task, not only does a non-robust classifier exist, but also an efficient algorithm that generates fresh new labeled samples given access to polynomially many training examples (termed as generation by Kearns et. al. (1994)). Third, we show that any such task implies the existence of cryptographic primitives such as one-way functions or even forms of public-key encryption. This leads us to a win-win scenario: either we can quickly learn an efficient robust classifier (assuming one exists), or we can construct new instances of popular and useful cryptographic primitives.
READ FULL TEXT
