DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Comparison of the h-index for Different Fields of Research Using Bootstrap Methodology

by   C. Malesios, et al.

An important disadvantage of the h-index is that typically it cannot take into account the specific field of research of a researcher. Usually sample point estimates of the average and median h-index values for the various fields are reported that are highly variable and dependent of the specific samples and it would be useful to provide confidence intervals of prediction accuracy. In this paper we apply the non-parametric bootstrap technique for constructing confidence intervals for the h-index for different fields of research. In this way no specific assumptions about the distribution of the empirical hindex are required as well as no large samples since that the methodology is based on resampling from the initial sample. The results of the analysis showed important differences between the various fields. The performance of the bootstrap intervals for the mean and median h-index for most fields seems to be rather satisfactory as revealed by the performed simulation.


page 14

page 19


Parametric Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for the Multivariate Fay-Herriot Model

The multivariate Fay-Herriot model is quite effective in combining infor...

New confidence interval methods for Shannon index

Several factors affect the structure of communities, including biologica...

On some properties of medians, percentiles, baselines, and thresholds in empirical bibliometric analysis

One of the most useful and correct methodological approaches in bibliome...

Mapping Leaf Area Index with a Smartphone and Gaussian Processes

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key biophysical parameter used to determine f...

A Parametric Bootstrap for the Mean Measure of Divergence

For more than 50 years the Mean Measure of Divergence (MMD) has been on...

The out-of-sample R^2: estimation and inference

Out-of-sample prediction is the acid test of predictive models, yet an i...