Comparison of Multiplexing Policies for FPS Games in terms of Subjective Quality

07/29/2020
by   Jose Saldana, et al.
0

This paper compares two policies which can be used for multiplexing the traffic of a number of players of a First Person Shooter game. A network scenario in which a number of players share an access network has been simulated, in order to compare the policies in terms of a subjective quality estimator. The first policy, namely timeout, achieves higher bandwidth savings, while the second one, period, introduces less delay and jitter. The results show that the difference in terms of QoE is only significant when the number of players is small. Thus, in order to make the correct decision, the concrete network scenario and the characteristics of the router would have to be considered in each case, taking into account the estimation of the subjective quality that can be expected.

READ FULL TEXT
research
07/30/2020

Traffic Optimization for TCP-based Massive Multiplayer Online Games

This paper studies the use of a traffic optimization technique named TCM...
research
07/30/2020

Can a Wi-Fi WLAN Support a First Person Shooter?

In corporate and commercial environments, the deployment of a set of coo...
research
02/11/2022

Visualising Multiplayer Game Spaces

We compare four different `game-spaces' in terms of their usefulness in ...
research
09/20/2022

Mutual knowledge of rationality and correct beliefs in n-person games: An impossibility theorem

There are two well-known sufficient conditions for Nash equilibrium: com...
research
03/24/2016

Evaluating the Performance of Offensive Linemen in the NFL

How does one objectively measure the performance of an individual offens...
research
05/31/2023

Modelling the Performance of High Capacity Access Networks for the Benefit of End-Users and Public Policies

This paper deals with the challenge of modeling the performance of plann...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset