Comparing Process Calculi Using Encodings

08/23/2019
by   Kirstin Peters, et al.
0

Encodings or the proof of their absence are the main way to compare process calculi. To analyse the quality of encodings and to rule out trivial or meaningless encodings, they are augmented with encodability criteria. There exists a bunch of different criteria and different variants of criteria in order to reason in different settings. This leads to incomparable results. Moreover, it is not always clear whether the criteria used to obtain a result in a particular setting do indeed fit to this setting. This paper provides a short survey on often used encodability criteria, general frameworks that try to provide a unified notion of the quality of an encoding, and methods to analyse and compare encodability criteria.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/12/2022

Encodability Criteria for Quantum Based Systems (Technical Report)

This technical report contains the proofs to the lemmata and theorems of...
research
07/11/2023

Probabilistic Operational Correspondence (Technical Report)

Encodings are the main way to compare process calculi. By applying quali...
research
03/20/2018

Local criteria for triangulation of manifolds

We present criteria for establishing a triangulation of a manifold. Give...
research
08/25/2010

Modélisation d'une analyse pragma-linguistique d'un forum de discussion

We present in this paper, a modelling of an expertise in pragmatics. We ...
research
03/07/2023

Compositional Confluence Criteria

We show how confluence criteria based on decreasing diagrams are general...
research
05/24/2021

Towards Standard Criteria for human evaluation of Chatbots: A Survey

Human evaluation is becoming a necessity to test the performance of Chat...
research
09/11/2020

How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis

In scholarly publishing, blacklists aim to register fraudulent or decept...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset