Comments on: "A Random Forest Guided Tour" by G. Biau and E. Scornet

04/06/2016
by   Sylvain Arlot, et al.
0

This paper is a comment on the survey paper by Biau and Scornet (2016) about random forests. We focus on the problem of quantifying the impact of each ingredient of random forests on their performance. We show that such a quantification is possible for a simple pure forest , leading to conclusions that could apply more generally. Then, we consider "hold-out" random forests, which are a good middle point between "toy" pure forests and Breiman's original random forests.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/20/2013

Consistency of Online Random Forests

As a testament to their success, the theory of random forests has long b...
research
02/12/2018

Random Hinge Forest for Differentiable Learning

We propose random hinge forests, a simple, efficient, and novel variant ...
research
09/04/2023

Hidden variables unseen by Random Forests

Random Forests are widely claimed to capture interactions well. However,...
research
03/06/2023

Very fast, approximate counterfactual explanations for decision forests

We consider finding a counterfactual explanation for a classification or...
research
10/30/2014

A random forest system combination approach for error detection in digital dictionaries

When digitizing a print bilingual dictionary, whether via optical charac...
research
04/11/2022

Random Similarity Forests

The wealth of data being gathered about humans and their surroundings dr...
research
01/05/2023

Random forests, sound symbolism and Pokemon evolution

This study constructs machine learning algorithms that are trained to cl...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset