Combining Evidence

02/07/2022
by   Michael Evans, et al.
0

The problem of combining the evidence concerning an unknown, contained in each of k Bayesian inference bases, is discussed. This can be considered as a generalization of the problem of pooling k priors to determine a consensus prior. The linear opinion pool of Stone (1961) is seen to have the most appropriate properties for this role. In particular, linear pooling preserves a consensus with respect to the evidence and other rules do not. While linear pooling does not preserve prior independence, it is shown that it still behaves appropriately with respect to the expression of evidence in such a context. For the general problem of combining evidence, Jeffrey conditionalization plays a key role.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/15/2021

Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer models for combining multiple sources of evidence in a fraud detection system

Combining evidence from different sources can be achieved with Bayesian ...
research
03/27/2013

A Study of Associative Evidential Reasoning

Evidential reasoning is cast as the problem of simplifying the evidence-...
research
01/21/2023

How to Measure Evidence: Bayes Factors or Relative Belief Ratios?

Both the Bayes factor and the relative belief ratio satisfy the principl...
research
03/27/2013

Modifiable Combining Functions

Modifiable combining functions are a synthesis of two common approaches ...
research
01/23/2013

Graphical Representations of Consensus Belief

Graphical models based on conditional independence support concise encod...
research
12/14/2021

Local Prediction Pools

We propose local prediction pools as a method for combining the predicti...
research
02/15/2018

Truth Validation with Evidence

In the modern era, abundant information is easily accessible from variou...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset