Codes, Functions, and Causes: A Critique of Brette's Conceptual Analysis of Coding

04/18/2019
by   David Barack, et al.
0

In a recent article, Brette argues that coding as a concept is inappropriate for explanations of neurocognitive phenomena. Here, we argue that Brette's conceptual analysis mischaracterizes the structure of causal claims in coding and other forms of analysis-by-decomposition. We argue that analyses of this form are permissible, conceptually coherent, and offer essential tools for building and developing models of neurocognitive systems like the brain.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/18/2019

Is coding a relevant metaphor for building AI? A commentary on "Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain?", by Romain Brette

Brette contends that the neural coding metaphor is an invalid basis for ...
research
07/06/2020

Space of Reasons and Mathematical Model

Inferential relations govern our concept use. In order to understand a c...
research
03/17/2022

Towards Axiomatic Foundations for Conceptual Modeling: An Example

Conceptual modeling is a strongly interdisciplinary field of research. A...
research
01/07/2014

Proposta di nuovi strumenti per comprendere come funziona la cognizione (Novel tools to understand how cognition works)

I think that the main reason why we do not understand the general princi...
research
03/27/2022

OneLabeler: A Flexible System for Building Data Labeling Tools

Labeled datasets are essential for supervised machine learning. Various ...
research
06/18/2017

Detecting Large Concept Extensions for Conceptual Analysis

When performing a conceptual analysis of a concept, philosophers are int...
research
08/28/2018

Psychological Frameworks for Persuasive Information and Communications Technologies

When developing devices to encourage positive change in users, social ps...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset