Classical vs. Bayesian methods for linear system identification: point estimators and confidence sets

07/02/2015
by   D. Romeres, et al.
0

This paper compares classical parametric methods with recently developed Bayesian methods for system identification. A Full Bayes solution is considered together with one of the standard approximations based on the Empirical Bayes paradigm. Results regarding point estimators for the impulse response as well as for confidence regions are reported.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/07/2019

Bias-Aware Confidence Intervals for Empirical Bayes Analysis

In an empirical Bayes analysis, we use data from repeated sampling to im...
research
09/03/2022

Optimal empirical Bayes estimation for the Poisson model via minimum-distance methods

The Robbins estimator is the most iconic and widely used procedure in th...
research
08/16/2021

Revisiting Empirical Bayes Methods and Applications to Special Types of Data

Empirical Bayes methods have been around for a long time and have a wide...
research
09/26/2018

Symmetry Exploits for Bayesian Cubature Methods

Bayesian cubature provides a flexible framework for numerical integratio...
research
10/09/2019

On Post-Selection Inference in A/B Tests

When a large number of simultaneous statistical inferences are conducted...
research
12/29/2022

Robust Bayesian Subspace Identification for Small Data Sets

Model estimates obtained from traditional subspace identification method...
research
05/14/2019

Estimating Bayes factors from minimal ANOVA summaries for repeated-measures designs

In this paper, we develop a formula for estimating Bayes factors from re...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset