Civil Asset Forfeiture: A Judicial Perspective

10/05/2017
by   Leslie Barrett, et al.
0

Civil Asset Forfeiture (CAF) is a longstanding and controversial legal process viewed on the one hand as a powerful tool for combating drug crimes and on the other hand as a violation of the rights of US citizens. Data used to support both sides of the controversy to date has come from government sources representing records of the events at the time of occurrence. Court dockets represent litigation events initiated following the forfeiture, however, and can thus provide a new perspective on the CAF legal process. This paper will show new evidence supporting existing claims about the growth of the practice and bias in its application based on the quantitative analysis of data derived from these court cases.

READ FULL TEXT
research
12/13/2021

Ergo – a programming language for Smart Legal Contracts

We present a smart legal contract platform to support a wide range of sm...
research
09/06/2022

From Legal Contracts to Legal Calculi: the code-driven normativity

Using dedicated software to represent or enact legislation or regulation...
research
10/04/2021

LawSum: A weakly supervised approach for Indian Legal Document Summarization

Unlike the courts in western countries, public records of Indian judicia...
research
11/04/2020

Not fit for Purpose: A critical analysis of the 'Five Safes'

Adopted by government agencies in Australia, New Zealand and the UK as p...
research
12/11/2014

Certifying and removing disparate impact

What does it mean for an algorithm to be biased? In U.S. law, unintentio...
research
03/08/2019

Let's Play Mahjong!

Mahjong is a very popular tile-based game commonly played by four player...
research
06/19/2022

Adversarial Scrutiny of Evidentiary Statistical Software

The U.S. criminal legal system increasingly relies on software output to...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset