CDfdr: A Comparison Density Approach to Local False Discovery Rate Estimation

08/11/2013
by   Subhadeep Mukhopadhyay, et al.
0

Efron et al. (2001) proposed empirical Bayes formulation of the frequentist Benjamini and Hochbergs False Discovery Rate method (Benjamini and Hochberg,1995). This article attempts to unify the `two cultures' using concepts of comparison density and distribution function. We have also shown how almost all of the existing local fdr methods can be viewed as proposing various model specification for comparison density - unifies the vast literature of false discovery methods under one concept and notation.

READ FULL TEXT

page 14

page 15

research
07/08/2019

Aggregated False Discovery Rate Control

We propose an aggregation scheme for methods that control the false disc...
research
11/06/2021

Empirical Bayes Control of the False Discovery Exceedance

In sparse large-scale testing problems where the false discovery proport...
research
07/15/2022

The edge of discovery: Controlling the local false discovery rate at the margin

Despite the popularity of the false discovery rate (FDR) as an error con...
research
08/20/2019

Dimension constraints improve hypothesis testing for large-scale, graph-associated, brain-image data

For large-scale testing with graph-associated data, we present an empiri...
research
09/05/2021

A Q-Q plot aids interpretation of the False Discovery Rate

A method is demonstrated for representing the false discovery rate (FDR)...
research
12/12/2018

Multiple Model-Free Knockoffs

Model-free knockoffs is a recently proposed technique for identifying co...
research
04/11/2018

A Likelihood Ratio Approach for Precise Discovery of Truly Relevant Protein Markers

The process of biomarker discovery is typically lengthy and costly, invo...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset