DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations?

by   Kayvan Kousha, et al.

Dissertations can be the single most important scholarly outputs of junior researchers. Whilst sets of journal articles are often evaluated with the help of citation counts from the Web of Science or Scopus, these do not index dissertations and so their impact is hard to assess. In response, this article introduces a new multistage method to extract Google Scholar citation counts for large collections of dissertations from repositories indexed by Google. The method was used to extract Google Scholar citation counts for 77,884 American doctoral dissertations from 2013-2017 via ProQuest, with a precision of over 95 could not be retrieved with ProQuest-specific searches but could be found with Google Scholar searches of the other repositories. The Google Scholar citation counts were then compared with Mendeley reader counts, a known source of scholarly-like impact data. A fifth of the dissertations had at least one citation recorded in Google Scholar and slightly fewer had at least one Mendeley reader. Based on numerical comparisons, the Mendeley reader counts seem to be more useful for impact assessment purposes for dissertations that are less than two years old, whilst Google Scholar citations are more useful for older dissertations, especially in social sciences, arts and humanities. Google Scholar citation counts may reflect a more scholarly type of impact than that of Mendeley reader counts because dissertations attract a substantial minority of their citations from other dissertations. In summary, the new method now makes it possible for research funders, institutions and others to systematically evaluate the impact of dissertations, although additional Google Scholar queries for other online repositories are needed to ensure comprehensive coverage.


page 11

page 16

page 17

page 21


Can Microsoft Academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books?

Despite recent evidence that Microsoft Academic is an extensive source o...

COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts

The COVID-19 pandemic requires a fast response from researchers to help ...

Providing early indication of regional anomalies in COVID19 case counts in England using search engine queries

COVID19 was first reported in England at the end of January 2020, and by...

Faster indicators of dengue fever case counts using Google and Twitter

Dengue is a major threat to public health in Brazil, the world's sixth b...

Large coverage fluctuations in Google Scholar: a case study

Unlike other academic bibliographic databases, Google Scholar intentiona...

Who Should Google Scholar Update More Often?

We consider a resource-constrained updater, such as Google Scholar, whic...