Both the validity of the cultural tightness index and the association with creativity and order are spurious – a comment on Jackson et al

by   Alexander Koplenig, et al.

It was recently suggested in a study published in Nature Human Behaviour that the historical loosening of American culture was associated with a trade-off between higher creativity and lower order. To this end, Jackson et al. generate a linguistic index of cultural tightness based on the Google Books Ngram corpus and use this index to show that American norms loosened between 1800 and 2000. While we remain agnostic toward a potential loosening of American culture and a statistical association with creativity/order, we show here that the methods used by Jackson et al. are neither suitable for testing the validity of the index nor for establishing possible relationships with creativity/order.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Further Collapses in TFNP

We show =∩. Here the class consists of all total search problems that r...

Higher Order Linear Transformer

Following up on the linear transformer part of the article from Katharop...

Cultural association based on machine learning for team formation

Culture is core to human civilization, and is essential for human intell...

Systematic quantitative analyses reveal the folk-zoological knowledge embedded in folktales

Cultural learning is a unique human capacity essential for a wide range ...

Does the h_α index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R

Recently, Hirsch (2019a) proposed a new variant of the h index called th...

Recovery of a mixture of Gaussians by sum-of-norms clustering

Sum-of-norms clustering is a method for assigning n points in R^d to K c...