Book reviews in academic journals: patterns and dynamics

by   Weishu Liu, et al.

Book reviews play important roles in scholarly communication especially in arts and humanities disciplines. By using Web of Science's Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts & Humanities Citation Index, this study probed the patterns and dynamics of book reviews within these three indexes empirically during the past decade (2006-2015). We found that the absolute numbers of book reviews among all the three indexes were relatively stable but the relative shares were decreasing. Book reviews were very common in arts and humanities, common in social sciences, but rare in natural sciences. Book reviews are mainly contributed by authors from developed economies such as the USA and the UK. Oppositely, scholars from China and Japan are unlikely to contribute to book reviews.



There are no comments yet.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Sentiment Analysis in Scholarly Book Reviews

So far different studies have tackled the sentiment analysis in several ...

A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers

Web of Science and Scopus are two world-leading and competing citation d...

Measuring Book Impact Based on the Multi-granularity Online Review Mining

As with articles and journals, the customary methods for measuring books...

Nine Million Book Items and Eleven Million Citations: A Study of Book-Based Scholarly Communication Using OpenCitations

Books have been widely used to share information and contribute to human...

Enhancing the role of academic librarians in conducting scoping reviews

Information exposing, in conjunction with technological innovations and ...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.