Blameworthiness in Strategic Games

09/14/2018
by   Pavel Naumov, et al.
0

There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of this paper is on the blameworthiness defined through the principle of alternative possibilities: a coalition is blamable for a statement if the statement is true, but the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. The main technical result is a sound and complete bimodal logical system that describes properties of blameworthiness in one-shot games.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/05/2018

Blameworthiness in Games with Imperfect Information

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in...
research
10/18/2019

Blameworthiness in Security Games

Security games are an example of a successful real-world application of ...
research
11/05/2018

Knowledge and Blameworthiness

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in...
research
01/22/2019

The Limits of Morality in Strategic Games

A coalition is blameable for an outcome if the coalition had a strategy ...
research
05/02/2019

Some Structure Properties of Finite Normal-Form Games

Game theory provides a mathematical framework for analysing strategic si...
research
11/08/2019

Duty to Warn in Strategic Games

The paper investigates the second-order blameworthiness or duty to warn ...
research
01/04/2021

Strategic Features for General Games

This short paper describes an ongoing research project that requires the...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset