Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

11/25/2016

∙

This paper discusses the semantics of weighted argumentation graphs that are biplor, i.e. contain both attacks and support graphs. The work builds on previous work by Amgoud, Ben-Naim et. al., which presents and compares several semantics for argumentation graphs that contain only supports or only attacks relationships, respectively.

READ FULL TEXT

Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

Modular Semantics and Characteristics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

Many-valued Argumentation, Conditionals and a Probabilistic Semantics for Gradual Argumentation

Visualising Argumentation Graphs with Graph Embeddings and t-SNE

A novel structured argumentation framework for improved explainability of classification tasks

AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks

Convergence and Open-Mindedness of Discrete and Continuous Semantics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation (Technical Report)

Interpreting Neural Networks as Gradual Argumentation Frameworks (Including Proof Appendix)

Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

Related Research

Modular Semantics and Characteristics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs

Many-valued Argumentation, Conditionals and a Probabilistic Semantics for Gradual Argumentation

Visualising Argumentation Graphs with Graph Embeddings and t-SNE

A novel structured argumentation framework for improved explainability of classification tasks

AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks

Convergence and Open-Mindedness of Discrete and Continuous Semantics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation (Technical Report)

Interpreting Neural Networks as Gradual Argumentation Frameworks (Including Proof Appendix)