Bipolar in Temporal Argumentation Framework

03/05/2019
by   Maximiliano C. D. Budán, et al.
0

A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The original proposal is based on a single, abstract notion of attack between arguments that remains static and permanent in time. Thus, in general, when identifying the set of acceptable arguments, the outcome associated with a TAF will vary over time. In this work we introduce an extension of TAF adding the capability of modeling a support relation between arguments. In this sense, the resulting framework provides a suitable model for different time-dependent issues. Thus, the main contribution here is to provide an enhanced framework for modeling a positive (support) and negative (attack) interaction varying over time, which are relevant in many real-world situations. This leads to a Timed Bipolar Argumentation Framework (T-BAF), where classical argument extensions can be defined. The proposal aims at advancing in the integration of temporal argumentation in different application domain.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/09/2002

Collective Argumentation

An extension of an abstract argumentation framework, called collective a...
research
07/08/2002

"Minimal defence": a refinement of the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks

Dung's abstract framework for argumentation enables a study of the inter...
research
05/14/2014

Probabilistic Argumentation with Epistemic Extensions and Incomplete Information

Abstract argumentation offers an appealing way of representing and evalu...
research
06/30/2011

Graduality in Argumentation

Argumentation is based on the exchange and valuation of interacting argu...
research
02/05/2018

Abstractly Interpreting Argumentation Frameworks for Sharpening Extensions

Cycles of attacking arguments pose non-trivial issues in Dung style argu...
research
02/21/2018

Epistemic Graphs for Representing and Reasoning with Positive and Negative Influences of Arguments

This paper introduces epistemic graphs as a generalization of the episte...
research
10/11/2018

Automata for Infinite Argumentation Structures

The theory of abstract argumentation frameworks (afs) has, in the main, ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset