DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Bipolar in Temporal Argumentation Framework

03/05/2019
by   Maximiliano C. D. Budán, et al.
0

A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument. The original proposal is based on a single, abstract notion of attack between arguments that remains static and permanent in time. Thus, in general, when identifying the set of acceptable arguments, the outcome associated with a TAF will vary over time. In this work we introduce an extension of TAF adding the capability of modeling a support relation between arguments. In this sense, the resulting framework provides a suitable model for different time-dependent issues. Thus, the main contribution here is to provide an enhanced framework for modeling a positive (support) and negative (attack) interaction varying over time, which are relevant in many real-world situations. This leads to a Timed Bipolar Argumentation Framework (T-BAF), where classical argument extensions can be defined. The proposal aims at advancing in the integration of temporal argumentation in different application domain.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

07/09/2002

Collective Argumentation

An extension of an abstract argumentation framework, called collective a...
07/08/2002

"Minimal defence": a refinement of the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks

Dung's abstract framework for argumentation enables a study of the inter...
05/14/2014

Probabilistic Argumentation with Epistemic Extensions and Incomplete Information

Abstract argumentation offers an appealing way of representing and evalu...
06/30/2011

Graduality in Argumentation

Argumentation is based on the exchange and valuation of interacting argu...
02/05/2018

Abstractly Interpreting Argumentation Frameworks for Sharpening Extensions

Cycles of attacking arguments pose non-trivial issues in Dung style argu...
02/21/2018

Epistemic Graphs for Representing and Reasoning with Positive and Negative Influences of Arguments

This paper introduces epistemic graphs as a generalization of the episte...
10/11/2018

Automata for Infinite Argumentation Structures

The theory of abstract argumentation frameworks (afs) has, in the main, ...