Better Metrics for Ranking SE Researchers

05/29/2018
by   George Mathew, et al.
0

This paper studies how SE researchers are ranked using a variety of metrics and data from 35,406 authors of 35,391 papers from 34 top SE venues in the period 1992-2016. Based on that analysis, we: deprecate the widely used "h-index", favoring instead an alternate Weighted Page Rank(PR_W) metric that is somewhat analogous to the PageRank(PR) metric developed at Google. Unlike the h-index, PR_W rewards not just citation counts but also how often authors collaborate. Using PR_W, we offer a ranking of the top 20 SE authors in the last decade.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/18/2021

Impact of h-index on authors ranking: An improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked author

In academia, the research performance of a faculty is either evaluated b...
research
09/08/2021

Metrics to find a surrogate endpoint of OS in metastatic oncology trials: a simulation study

Surrogate endpoint (SE) for overall survival (OS) in cancer patients is ...
research
01/21/2018

La falacia del empate técnico electoral

It is argued that the concept of "technical tie" in electoral polls and ...
research
02/13/2021

Impact of h-index on authors ranking: A comparative analysis of Scopus and WoS

In academia, the research performance of the faculty members is either e...
research
05/10/2018

Human Capital in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping of Reconceptualized Human Aspect Studies

The human capital invested into software development plays a vital role ...
research
08/15/2021

Crowdsourcing the State of the Art(ifacts)

In any field, finding the "leading edge" of research is an on-going chal...
research
02/24/2022

Sequential asset ranking in nonstationary time series

We extend the research into cross-sectional momentum trading strategies....

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset