Bayesian meta-analysis for evaluating treatment effectiveness in biomarker subgroups using trials of mixed patient populations

06/06/2023
by   Lorna Wheaton, et al.
0

During drug development, evidence can emerge to suggest a treatment is more effective in a specific patient subgroup. Whilst early trials may be conducted in biomarker-mixed populations, later trials are more likely to enrol biomarker-positive patients alone, thus leading to trials of the same treatment investigated in different populations. When conducting a meta-analysis, a conservative approach would be to combine only trials conducted in the biomarker-positive subgroup. However, this discards potentially useful information on treatment effects in the biomarker-positive subgroup concealed within observed treatment effects in biomarker-mixed populations. We extend standard random-effects meta-analysis to combine treatment effects obtained from trials with different populations to estimate pooled treatment effects in a biomarker subgroup of interest. The model assumes a systematic difference in treatment effects between biomarker-positive and biomarker-negative subgroups, which is estimated from trials which report either or both treatment effects. The estimated systematic difference and proportion of biomarker-negative patients in biomarker-mixed studies are used to interpolate treatment effects in the biomarker-positive subgroup from observed treatment effects in the biomarker-mixed population. The developed methods are applied to an illustrative example in metastatic colorectal cancer and evaluated in a simulation study. In the example, the developed method resulted in improved precision of the pooled treatment effect estimate compared to standard random-effects meta-analysis of trials investigating only biomarker-positive patients. The simulation study confirmed that when the systematic difference in treatment effects between biomarker subgroups is not very large, the developed method can improve precision of estimation of pooled treatment effects while maintaining low bias.

READ FULL TEXT

page 4

page 16

page 17

page 26

research
08/28/2019

Rethinking meta-analysis: assessing case-mix heterogeneity when combining treatment effects across patient populations

Case-mix heterogeneity across studies complicates meta-analyses. As a re...
research
10/30/2018

Recent advances in methodology for clinical trials in small populations: the InSPiRe project

Where there are a limited number of patients, such as in a rare disease,...
research
03/17/2020

Degree irregularity and rank probability bias in network meta-analysis

Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical technique for the compariso...
research
12/15/2021

Informed Bayesian survival analysis

We overview Bayesian estimation, hypothesis testing, and model-averaging...
research
08/17/2019

Decline of COPD exacerbations in clinical trials over two decades – a systematic review and meta-regression

BACKGROUND: An important goal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (...
research
09/09/2018

Combining tumour response and progression free survival as surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

Progression free survival (PFS) and tumour response (TR) have been inves...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset