Bayes factors and posterior estimation: Two sides of the very same coin

04/12/2022
by   Harlan Campbell, et al.
0

Recently, several researchers have claimed that conclusions obtained from a Bayes factor (or the posterior odds) may contradict those obtained from Bayesian posterior estimation. In this short paper, we wish to point out that no such "incompatibility" exists if one is willing to consistently define one's priors and posteriors. The key for compatibility is that the (implied) prior model odds used for testing are the same as those used for estimation. Our recommendation is simple: If one reports a Bayes factor comparing two models, then one should also report posterior estimates which appropriately acknowledge the uncertainty with regards to which of the two models is correct.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/13/2020

Power-Expected-Posterior Priors as Mixtures of g-Priors

One of the main approaches used to construct prior distributions for obj...
research
07/02/2020

Posterior Model Adaptation With Updated Priors

Classification approaches based on the direct estimation and analysis of...
research
02/28/2019

Bounds on Bayes Factors for Binomial A/B Testing

Bayes factors, in many cases, have been proven to bridge the classic -va...
research
01/03/2023

The E-Posterior

We develop a representation of a decision maker's uncertainty based on e...
research
03/06/2013

Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis

We compare the diagnostic accuracy of three diagnostic inference models:...
research
02/26/2021

Reverse-Bayes methods: a review of recent technical advances

It is now widely accepted that the standard inferential toolkit used by ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset