Axioms for Defeat in Democratic Elections

08/15/2020
by   Wesley H. Holliday, et al.
0

We propose six axioms concerning when one candidate should defeat another in a democratic election involving two or more candidates. Five of the axioms are widely satisfied by known voting procedures. The sixth axiom is a weakening of Kenneth Arrow's famous condition of the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). We call this weakening Coherent IIA. We prove that the five axioms plus Coherent IIA single out a voting procedure studied in our recent work: Split Cycle. In particular, Split Cycle is the most resolute voting procedure satisfying the six axioms for democratic defeat. In addition, we analyze how Split Cycle escapes Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and related impossibility results.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/05/2020

Split Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers

We introduce a new Condorcet consistent voting method, called Split Cycl...
research
10/22/2022

An Axiomatic Characterization of Split Cycle

A number of rules for resolving majority cycles in elections have been p...
research
07/14/2021

A Smoothed Impossibility Theorem on Condorcet Criterion and Participation

In 1988, Moulin proved an insightful and surprising impossibility theore...
research
10/16/2021

Voting Theory in the Lean Theorem Prover

There is a long tradition of fruitful interaction between logic and soci...
research
05/06/2019

The distortion of distributed voting

Voting can abstractly model any decision-making scenario and as such it ...
research
10/23/2021

Vertebrae segmentation, identification and localization using a graph optimization and a synergistic cycle

This paper considers the segmentation, identification and localization o...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset