Automating the Dispute Resolution in Task Dependency Network

04/19/2013
by   Ioan Alfred Letia, et al.
0

When perturbation or unexpected events do occur, agents need protocols for repairing or reforming the supply chain. Unfortunate contingency could increase too much the cost of performance, while breaching the current contract may be more efficient. In our framework the principles of contract law are applied to set penalties: expectation damages, opportunity cost, reliance damages, and party design remedies, and they are introduced in the task dependency model

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/16/2020

Towards a Contract Service Provider Model for Virtual Assets and VASPs

We introduce the contract service provider (CSP) model as an analog of t...
research
05/20/2019

Privacy-Preserving P2P Energy Market on the Blockchain

Quartierstrom creates a peer-to-peer marketplace for locally generated s...
research
03/02/2023

Developing a Compiler for EROP – A Language for the Specification of Smart Contracts, An Experience Report

A smart contract is a translation of a standard paper-based contract tha...
research
04/01/2022

Differential Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3 and Implications for Contract Design

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) provide a means for users to trade pairs ...
research
11/14/2017

A bilevel approach for optimal contract pricing of independent dispatchable DG units in distribution networks

Distributed Generation (DG) units are increasingly installed in the powe...
research
09/21/2023

A knowledge representation approach for construction contract knowledge modeling

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) presents an unprecedented ...
research
01/16/2020

Expecting the Unexpected: Developing Autonomous-System Design Principles for Reacting to Unpredicted Events and Conditions

When developing autonomous systems, engineers and other stakeholders mak...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset