Automatically Annotating Articles Towards Opening and Reusing Transparent Peer Reviews

12/03/2018
by   Afshin Sadeghi, et al.
0

An increasing number of scientific publications are created in open and transparent peer review models: a submission is published first, and then reviewers are invited, or a submission is reviewed in a closed environment but then these reviews are published with the final article, or combinations of these. Reasons for open peer review include giving better credit to reviewers and enabling readers to better appraise the quality of a publication. In most cases, the full, unstructured text of an open review is published next to the full, unstructured text of the article reviewed. This approach prevents human readers from getting a quick impression of the quality of parts of an article, and it does not easily support secondary exploitation, e.g., for scientometrics on reviews. While document formats have been proposed for publishing structured articles including reviews, integrated tool support for entire open peer review workflows resulting in such documents is still scarce. We present AR-Annotator, the Automatic Article and Review Annotator which employs a semantic information model of an article and its reviews, using semantic markup and unique identifiers for all entities of interest. The fine-grained article structure is not only exposed to authors and reviewers but also preserved in the published version. We publish articles and their reviews in a Linked Data representation and thus maximize their reusability by third-party applications. We demonstrate this reusability by running quality-related queries against the structured representation of articles and their reviews.

READ FULL TEXT

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 9

page 10

research
05/11/2020

Citations versus expert opinions: Citation analysis of Featured Reviews of the American Mathematical Society

Peer review and citation metrics are two means of gauging the value of s...
research
05/30/2013

For a Semantic Web based Peer-reviewing and Publication of Research Results

This article shows why the diffusion and peer-reviewing of research resu...
research
06/11/2020

A Unified Nanopublication Model for Effective and User-Friendly Access to the Elements of Scientific Publishing

Scientific publishing is the means by which we communicate and share sci...
research
10/08/2019

Peer Reviewing Revisited: Assessing Research with Interlinked Semantic Comments

Scientific publishing seems to be at a turning point. Its paradigm has s...
research
08/10/2021

How near-duplicate detection improves editors' and authors' publishing experience

We describe a system that helps identify manuscripts submitted to multip...
research
12/10/2020

Argument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews

Peer reviewing is a central process in modern research and essential for...
research
10/16/2021

A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussions

At the foundation of scientific evaluation is the labor-intensive proces...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset