Auto-bidding Equilibrium in ROI-Constrained Online Advertising Markets
share
Most of the work in auction design literature assumes that bidders behave rationally based on the information available. However, in today's online advertising markets, one of the most important real-life applications of auction design, the data and computational power required to bid optimally are only available to the auction designer, and an advertiser can only participate by setting performance objectives (clicks, conversions, etc.) for the campaign. In this paper, we focus on value-maximizing campaigns with return-on-investment (ROI) constraints, which is widely adopted in many global-scale auto-bidding platforms. Through theoretical analysis and empirical experiments on both synthetic and realistic data, we find that second price auction exhibits counter-intuitive behaviors in the resulted equilibrium and loses its dominant theoretical advantages in single-item scenarios. At the market scale, the equilibrium structure becomes complicated and opens up space for bidders and even auctioneers to exploit. We also explore the broader impacts of the auto-bidding mechanism beyond efficiency and strategyproofness. In particular, multiplicity of equilibria and input sensitivity make the utility unstable. In addition, the interference among both bidders and goods introduces bias into A/B testing, which hinders the development of even non-bidding components. The aforementioned phenomena have been widely observed in practice, and our results indicate that one of the reasons might be intrinsic to the underlying auto-bidding mechanism. To deal with these challenges, we provide suggestions and potential solutions for practitioners.
READ FULL TEXT
