Assumption-Based Approaches to Reasoning with Priorities

09/21/2017
by   Jesse Heyninck, et al.
0

This paper maps out the relation between different approaches for handling preferences in argumentation with strict rules and defeasible assumptions by offering translations between them. The systems we compare are: non-prioritized defeats i.e. attacks, preference-based defeats, and preference-based defeats extended with reverse defeat.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/10/2016

ABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences

We present ABA+, a new approach to handling preferences in a well known ...
research
04/01/2016

Relations between assumption-based approaches in nonmonotonic logic and formal argumentation

In this paper we make a contribution to the unification of formal models...
research
09/02/2014

Deontic modality based on preference

Deontic modalities are here defined in terms of the preference relation ...
research
04/18/2021

Transitivity, Time Consumption, and Quality of Preference Judgments in Crowdsourcing

Preference judgments have been demonstrated as a better alternative to g...
research
05/12/2020

Preference Elicitation in Assumption-Based Argumentation

Various structured argumentation frameworks utilize preferences as part ...
research
05/25/2023

Learning Assumption-based Argumentation Frameworks

We propose a novel approach to logic-based learning which generates assu...
research
08/02/2021

Escaping Arrow's Theorem: The Advantage-Standard Model

There is an extensive literature in social choice theory studying the co...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset