Assessing the Frontier: Active Learning, Model Accuracy, and Multi-objective Materials Discovery and Optimization

11/06/2019
by   Zachary del Rosario, et al.
0

Discovering novel materials can be greatly accelerated by iterative machine learning-informed proposal of candidates—active learning. However, standard global-scope error metrics for model quality are not predictive of discovery performance, and can be misleading. We introduce the notion of Pareto shell-scope error to help judge the suitability of a model for proposing material candidates. Further, through synthetic cases and a thermoelectric dataset, we probe the relation between acquisition function fidelity and active learning performance. Results suggest novel diagnostic tools, as well as new insights for acquisition function design.

READ FULL TEXT

page 15

page 16

research
04/12/2022

Benchmarking Active Learning Strategies for Materials Optimization and Discovery

Autonomous physical science is revolutionizing materials science. In the...
research
10/23/2022

Multi-Objective GFlowNets

In many applications of machine learning, like drug discovery and materi...
research
06/20/2023

Multi-Fidelity Active Learning with GFlowNets

In the last decades, the capacity to generate large amounts of data in s...
research
07/21/2020

Efficient Graph-Based Active Learning with Probit Likelihood via Gaussian Approximations

We present a novel adaptation of active learning to graph-based semi-sup...
research
11/20/2019

Iterative Peptide Modeling With Active Learning And Meta-Learning

Often the development of novel materials is not amenable to high-through...
research
08/16/2022

Active Bucketized Learning for ACOPF Optimization Proxies

This paper considers optimization proxies for Optimal Power Flow (OPF), ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset