Log In Sign Up

ArXiving Before Submission Helps Everyone

by   Dmytro Mishkin, et al.

We claim, and present evidence, that allowing arXiv publication before a conference or journal submission benefits researchers, especially early career, as well as the whole scientific community. Specifically, arXiving helps professional identity building, protects against independent re-discovery, idea theft and gate-keeping; it facilitates open research result distribution and reduces inequality. The advantages dwarf the drawbacks – mainly the relative increase in acceptance rate of papers of well-known authors – which studies show to be marginal. Analyzing the pros and cons of arXiving papers, we conclude that requiring preprints be anonymous is nearly as detrimental as not allowing them. We see no reasons why anyone but the authors should decide whether to arXiv or not.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


A continuous integration and web framework in support of the ATLAS Publication Process

The ATLAS collaboration defines methods, establishes procedures, and org...

Does your surname affect the citability of your publications?

Prior investigations have offered contrasting results on a troubling que...

A spatialised bibliometrics approach of a scientific journal production

Bibliometrics have become commonplace and widely used by authors and jou...

Empowering open science with reflexive and spatialised indicators

Bibliometrics have become commonplace and widely used by authors and jou...

Meta-Research: COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in school closures and distancing req...

A Correspondence Analysis Framework for Author-Conference Recommendations

For many years, achievements and discoveries made by scientists are made...