Argumentative Characterizations of (Extended) Disjunctive Logic Programs

06/12/2023
by   Jesse Heyninck, et al.
0

This paper continues an established line of research about the relations between argumentation theory, particularly assumption-based argumentation, and different kinds of logic programs. In particular, we extend known result of Caminada, Schultz and Toni by showing that assumption-based argumentation can represent not only normal logic programs, but also disjunctive logic programs and their extensions. For this, we consider some inference rules for disjunction that the core logic of the argumentation frameworks should respect, and show the correspondence to the handling of disjunctions in the heads of the logic programs' rules.

READ FULL TEXT
research
05/25/2023

Learning Assumption-based Argumentation Frameworks

We propose a novel approach to logic-based learning which generates assu...
research
09/12/2023

Games and Argumentation: Time for a Family Reunion!

The rule "defeated(X) ← attacks(Y,X), defeated(Y)" states that an argum...
research
07/15/2014

Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic Programming

We develop a model of abduction in abstract argumentation, where changes...
research
05/05/2014

On the Relative Expressiveness of Argumentation Frameworks, Normal Logic Programs and Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

We analyse the expressiveness of the two-valued semantics of abstract ar...
research
04/03/2023

smProbLog: Stable Model Semantics in ProbLog for Probabilistic Argumentation

Argumentation problems are concerned with determining the acceptability ...
research
04/29/2014

Analysis of Dialogical Argumentation via Finite State Machines

Dialogical argumentation is an important cognitive activity by which age...
research
04/18/2018

A General Account of Argumentation with Preferences

This paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general f...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset