DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

Analyzing the Machine Learning Conference Review Process

11/24/2020
by   David Tran, et al.
31

Mainstream machine learning conferences have seen a dramatic increase in the number of participants, along with a growing range of perspectives, in recent years. Members of the machine learning community are likely to overhear allegations ranging from randomness of acceptance decisions to institutional bias. In this work, we critically analyze the review process through a comprehensive study of papers submitted to ICLR between 2017 and 2020. We quantify reproducibility/randomness in review scores and acceptance decisions, and examine whether scores correlate with paper impact. Our findings suggest strong institutional bias in accept/reject decisions, even after controlling for paper quality. Furthermore, we find evidence for a gender gap, with female authors receiving lower scores, lower acceptance rates, and fewer citations per paper than their male counterparts. We conclude our work with recommendations for future conference organizers.

READ FULL TEXT

page 7

page 8

page 9

page 12

page 13

page 15

10/11/2020

An Open Review of OpenReview: A Critical Analysis of the Machine Learning Conference Review Process

Mainstream machine learning conferences have seen a dramatic increase in...
07/01/2020

De-anonymization of authors through arXiv submissions during double-blind review

In this paper, we investigate the effects of releasing arXiv preprints o...
11/30/2020

Prior and Prejudice: The Novice Reviewers' Bias against Resubmissions in Conference Peer Review

Modern machine learning and computer science conferences are experiencin...
06/01/2021

Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences

Recent successes in the Machine Learning community have led to a steep i...
10/13/2019

Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals

This paper provides a comparative study about seasonal influence on edit...
03/22/2022

Suum Cuique: Studying Bias in Taboo Detection with a Community Perspective

Prior research has discussed and illustrated the need to consider lingui...