An optimizable scalar objective value cannot be objective and should not be the sole objective

06/03/2020
by   Isabel Kloumann, et al.
0

This paper concerns the ethics and morality of algorithms and computational systems, and has been circulating internally at Facebook for the past couple years. The paper reviews many Nobel laureates' work, as well as the work of other prominent scientists such as Richard Dawkins, Andrei Kolmogorov, Vilfredo Pareto, and John von Neumann. The paper draws conclusions based on such works, as summarized in the title. The paper argues that the standard approach to modern machine learning and artificial intelligence is bound to be biased and unfair, and that longstanding traditions in the professions of law, justice, politics, and medicine should help.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/15/2020

Machine Learning as a Catalyst for Value-Based Health Care

In this manuscript, we present an argument that machine learning, a subf...
research
08/07/2022

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Quantum Technologies

In recent years, the dramatic progress in machine learning has begun to ...
research
10/08/2018

The 30-Year Cycle In The AI Debate

In the last couple of years, the rise of Artificial Intelligence and the...
research
03/17/2018

Viewpoint: Artificial Intelligence and Labour

The welfare of modern societies has been intrinsically linked to wage la...
research
12/16/2019

PDQ TMK + PDQF – A Test Drive of Facebook's Perceptual Hashing Algorithms

Efficient and reliable automated detection of modified image and multime...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset