An Approach to Characterize Graded Entailment of Arguments through a Label-based Framework

03/05/2019
by   Maximiliano C. D. Budán, et al.
0

Argumentation theory is a powerful paradigm that formalizes a type of commonsense reasoning that aims to simulate the human ability to resolve a specific problem in an intelligent manner. A classical argumentation process takes into account only the properties related to the intrinsic logical soundness of an argument in order to determine its acceptability status. However, these properties are not always the only ones that matter to establish the argument's acceptability---there exist other qualities, such as strength, weight, social votes, trust degree, relevance level, and certainty degree, among others.

READ FULL TEXT
research
09/01/2021

Intrinsic Argument Strength in Structured Argumentation: a Principled Approach

Abstract argumentation provides us with methods such as gradual and Dung...
research
07/15/2022

Fuzzy Labeling Semantics for Quantitative Argumentation

The topic of evaluating argument strength in various quantitative argume...
research
03/06/2013

Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning

Argumentation is the process of constructing arguments about proposition...
research
12/23/2020

Stability in Abstract Argumentation

The notion of stability in a structured argumentation setup characterize...
research
12/17/2018

Trichotomic Argumentation Representation

The Aristotelian trichotomy distinguishes three aspects of argumentation...
research
04/19/2013

Enacting Social Argumentative Machines in Semantic Wikipedia

This research advocates the idea of combining argumentation theory with ...
research
01/28/2021

Strategic Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion: Framework and Experiments Based on Modelling the Beliefs and Concerns of the Persuadee

Persuasion is an important and yet complex aspect of human intelligence....

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset