Log In Sign Up

Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention

by   Lutz Bornmann, et al.

The web-based microblogging system Twitter is a very popular altmetrics source for measuring the broader impact of science. In this case study, we demonstrate how problematic the use of Twitter data for research evaluation can be, even though the aspiration of measurement is degraded from impact to attention measurement. We collected the Twitter data for the paper published by Yamamizu et al. (2017). An investigative committee found that the main figures in the paper are fraudulent.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


The stability of Twitter metrics: A study on unavailable Twitter mentions of scientific publications

This paper investigates the stability of Twitter counts of scientific pu...

Urban Twitter Networks and Communities: A Case Study of Microblogging in Athens

This paper examines the community formed by the Twitter users that used ...

Actively Learning to Attract Followers on Twitter

Twitter, a popular social network, presents great opportunities for on-l...

Detecting Propagators of Disinformation on Twitter Using Quantitative Discursive Analysis

Efforts by foreign actors to influence public opinion have gained consid...

Scholars on Twitter: who and how many are they?

In this paper we present a novel methodology for identifying scholars wi...

Understanding the Dynamics between Vaping and Cannabis Legalization Using Twitter Opinions

Cannabis legalization has been welcomed by many U.S. states but its role...