Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree

09/12/2017
by   Richard Pettigrew, et al.
0

In this paper, we explore how we should aggregate the degrees of belief of of a group of agents to give a single coherent set of degrees of belief, when at least some of those agents might be probabilistically incoherent. There are a number of way of aggregating degrees of belief, and there are a number of ways of fixing incoherent degrees of belief. When we have picked one of each, should we aggregate first and then fix, or fix first and then aggregate? Or should we try to do both at once? And when do these different procedures agree with one another? In this paper, we focus particularly on the final question.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
01/11/2010

A betting interpretation for probabilities and Dempster-Shafer degrees of belief

There are at least two ways to interpret numerical degrees of belief in ...
research
03/11/2002

Representing and Aggregating Conflicting Beliefs

We consider the two-fold problem of representing collective beliefs and ...
research
01/23/2018

Quantified Degrees of Group Responsibility (Extended Abstract)

This paper builds on an existing notion of group responsibility and prop...
research
09/16/2011

Contradiction measures and specificity degrees of basic belief assignments

In the theory of belief functions, many measures of uncertainty have bee...
research
08/01/2023

Weihrauch degrees without roots

We answer the following question by Arno Pauly: "Is there a square-root ...
research
07/28/2011

Social choice rules driven by propositional logic

Several rules for social choice are examined from a unifying point of vi...
research
06/26/2020

Incremental inference of collective graphical models

We consider incremental inference problems from aggregate data for colle...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset