Aggregating human judgment probabilistic predictions of COVID-19 transmission, burden, and preventative measures

04/05/2022
by   Allison Codi, et al.
0

Aggregated human judgment forecasts for COVID-19 targets of public health importance are accurate, often outperforming computational models. Our work shows aggregated human judgment forecasts for infectious agents are timely, accurate, and adaptable, and can be used as tool to aid public health decision making during outbreaks.

READ FULL TEXT
research
02/20/2022

Chimeric forecasting: combining probabilistic predictions from computational models and human judgment

Forecasts of the trajectory of an infectious agent can help guide public...
research
03/16/2021

A Multilayer Network Model implementation for Covid-19

We present a numerical implementation for a multilayer network used to m...
research
02/03/2022

COVID-19 Hospitalizations Forecasts Using Internet Search Data

As the COVID-19 spread over the globe and new variants of COVID-19 keep ...
research
01/28/2022

Comparing trained and untrained probabilistic ensemble forecasts of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the United States

The U.S. COVID-19 Forecast Hub aggregates forecasts of the short-term bu...
research
06/08/2023

Assessment of Different Health Index Aggregation Techniques for Electric Utilities

The Health Index is a value (in terms of color or score) which describes...
research
09/14/2021

Written Justifications are Key to Aggregate Crowdsourced Forecasts

This paper demonstrates that aggregating crowdsourced forecasts benefits...
research
06/05/2023

Forecasting seasonal criminality using SARIMA: an application to monthly aggravated assaults in California

California experienced an increase in violent criminality during the las...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset