Aggregating Bipolar Opinions (With Appendix)

02/04/2021
by   Stefan Lauren, et al.
0

We introduce a novel method to aggregate Bipolar Argumentation (BA) Frameworks expressing opinions by different parties in debates. We use Bipolar Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) as an all-encompassing formalism for BA under different semantics. By leveraging on recent results on judgement aggregation in Social Choice Theory, we prove several preservation results, both positive and negative, for relevant properties of Bipolar ABA.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
01/16/2014

On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics

Translations between different nonmonotonic formalisms always have been ...
research
04/03/2016

Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-enabled Collective Intelligence

On the Web, there is always a need to aggregate opinions from the crowd ...
research
07/28/2017

Empirical Evaluation of Abstract Argumentation: Supporting the Need for Bipolar and Probabilistic Approaches

In dialogical argumentation it is often assumed that the involved partie...
research
06/22/2021

Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

In many real-life situations that involve exchanges of arguments, indivi...
research
08/30/2023

ABA Learning via ASP

Recently, ABA Learning has been proposed as a form of symbolic machine l...
research
03/05/2019

Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) admit several interpretations of...
research
05/25/2023

Learning Assumption-based Argumentation Frameworks

We propose a novel approach to logic-based learning which generates assu...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset