Accommodating heterogeneous missing data patterns for prostate cancer risk prediction

09/21/2021
by   Matthias Neumair, et al.
0

Objective: We compared six commonly used logistic regression methods for accommodating missing risk factor data from multiple heterogeneous cohorts, in which some cohorts do not collect some risk factors at all, and developed an online risk prediction tool that accommodates missing risk factors from the end-user. Study Design and Setting: Ten North American and European cohorts from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) were used for fitting a risk prediction tool for clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as Gleason grade group greater or equal 2 on standard TRUS prostate biopsy. One large European PBCG cohort was withheld for external validation, where calibration-in-the-large (CIL), calibration curves, and area-underneath-the-receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were evaluated. Ten-fold leave-one-cohort-internal validation further validated the optimal missing data approach. Results: Among 12,703 biopsies from 10 training cohorts, 3,597 (28 1,757 of 5,540 (32 the available cases method that pooled individual patient data containing all risk factors input by an end-user had best CIL, under-predicting risks as percentages by 2.9 the worst CIL (-13.3 optimal in internal cross-validation and thus used for development of an online risk tool. For end-users of the risk tool, two risk factors were mandatory: serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and age, and ten were optional: digital rectal exam, prostate volume, prior negative biopsy, 5-alpha-reductase-inhibitor use, prior PSA screen, African ancestry, Hispanic ethnicity, first-degree prostate-, breast-, and second-degree prostate-cancer family history.

READ FULL TEXT
POST COMMENT

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Authors

page 3

page 4

page 9

page 11

page 13

page 17

page 19

page 20

07/31/2020

Combining Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models

Accurate risk stratification is key to reducing cancer morbidity through...
02/03/2021

Investigating Critical Risk Factors in Liver Cancer Prediction

We exploit liver cancer prediction model using machine learning algorith...
03/13/2019

Predicting class-imbalanced business risk using resampling, regularization, and model ensembling algorithms

We aim at developing and improving the imbalanced business risk modeling...
08/10/2020

Predicting Risk of Developing Diabetic Retinopathy using Deep Learning

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening is instrumental in preventing blindn...
02/29/2020

Model-based ROC (mROC) curve: examining the effect of case-mix and model calibration on the ROC plot

The performance of a risk prediction model is often characterized in ter...
08/21/2019

Statistical approaches using longitudinal biomarkers for disease early detection: A comparison of methodologies

Early detection of clinical outcomes such as cancer may be predicted bas...
08/30/2019

Recognition of Smartphone User Activity: From A Cyclical Perspective

Smartphones have become an important tool for people's daily lives, whic...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.