Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic Programming

07/15/2014
by   Richard Booth, et al.
0

We develop a model of abduction in abstract argumentation, where changes to an argumentation framework act as hypotheses to explain the support of an observation. We present dialogical proof theories for the main decision problems (i.e., finding hypothe- ses that explain skeptical/credulous support) and we show that our model can be instantiated on the basis of abductive logic programs.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/10/2002

Well-Founded Argumentation Semantics for Extended Logic Programming

This paper defines an argumentation semantics for extended logic program...
research
06/12/2023

Argumentative Characterizations of (Extended) Disjunctive Logic Programs

This paper continues an established line of research about the relations...
research
03/27/2022

Abstract argumentation and answer set programming: two faces of Nelson's logic

In this work, we show that both logic programming and abstract argumenta...
research
08/24/2011

dynPARTIX - A Dynamic Programming Reasoner for Abstract Argumentation

The aim of this paper is to announce the release of a novel system for a...
research
04/27/2015

Theory of Semi-Instantiation in Abstract Argumentation

We study instantiated abstract argumentation frames of the form (S,R,I),...
research
06/27/2023

A novel structured argumentation framework for improved explainability of classification tasks

This paper presents a novel framework for structured argumentation, name...
research
09/12/2023

Games and Argumentation: Time for a Family Reunion!

The rule "defeated(X) ← attacks(Y,X), defeated(Y)" states that an argum...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset