A Review of Human Evaluation for Style Transfer

06/09/2021
by   Eleftheria Briakou, et al.
0

This paper reviews and summarizes human evaluation practices described in 97 style transfer papers with respect to three main evaluation aspects: style transfer, meaning preservation, and fluency. In principle, evaluations by human raters should be the most reliable. However, in style transfer papers, we find that protocols for human evaluations are often underspecified and not standardized, which hampers the reproducibility of research in this field and progress toward better human and automatic evaluation methods.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/20/2021

Evaluating the Evaluation Metrics for Style Transfer: A Case Study in Multilingual Formality Transfer

While the field of style transfer (ST) has been growing rapidly, it has ...
research
04/04/2019

Evaluating Style Transfer for Text

Research in the area of style transfer for text is currently bottlenecke...
research
10/09/2019

The Daunting Task of Real-World Textual Style Transfer Auto-Evaluation

The difficulty of textual style transfer lies in the lack of parallel co...
research
07/25/2022

ArtFID: Quantitative Evaluation of Neural Style Transfer

The field of neural style transfer has experienced a surge of research e...
research
09/26/2019

Decomposing Textual Information For Style Transfer

This paper focuses on latent representations that could effectively deco...
research
01/05/2021

On the interaction of automatic evaluation and task framing in headline style transfer

An ongoing debate in the NLG community concerns the best way to evaluate...
research
05/18/2018

Style Obfuscation by Invariance

The task of obfuscating writing style using sequence models has previous...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset