A Refutation of Guinea's "Understanding SAT is in P"

11/13/2017
by   Jackson Abascal, et al.
0

In this work, we summarize and critique the paper "Understanding SAT is in P" by Alejandro Sánchez Guinea [arXiv:1504.00337]. The paper claims to present a polynomial-time solution for the NP-complete language 3-SAT. We show that Guinea's algorithm is flawed and does not prove 3-SAT is in P.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/27/2018

Non-Interlaced SAT is in P

We investigate the NP-Complete problem SAT and the geometry of its insta...
research
04/05/2021

A Critique of Keum-Bae Cho's Proof that P⊊NP

In this paper we critique Keum-Bae Cho's proof that P⊊NP. This proof rel...
research
03/27/2018

An Efficient Method to Transform SAT problems to Binary Integer Linear Programming Problem

In computational complexity theory, a decision problem is NP-complete wh...
research
05/13/2019

About a certain NP complete problem

In this article, we introduce the concept of special decomposition of a ...
research
01/03/2020

Hard 3-CNF-SAT problems are in P– A first step in proving NP=P

The relationship between the complexity classes P and NP is an unsolved ...
research
12/06/2010

URSA: A System for Uniform Reduction to SAT

There are a huge number of problems, from various areas, being solved by...
research
06/16/2014

CCCP Algorithms to Minimize the Bethe free energy of 3-SAT Problem

The k-sat problem is a prototypical constraint satisfaction problem. The...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset