I Introduction
Graphbased representations commonly arise in a wide variety of systems that are naturally described in terms of relations between their components. For instance, Wu et al. [1] have represented the texts inside a webpage as graphs, with vertices representing words and edges denoting relations between words. Li et al. [2] have represented each video frame as a graph structure with vertices representing superpixels and edges denoting relations between superpixels. Tang et al. [3] have looked at the local spectral descriptors of each image as points and constructed the weighted graph based on neighborhood relations. Other typical examples include representing a chemical molecular structure or a document as graphs [4]. One main problem of analyzing these structures is that of measuring the similarity between two graphs for classification or clustering [5, 6]. For example, in network science a common objective is to detect the extreme events that can significantly change the timevarying network structures [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] abstracted from vectorial time series [14]. Given a measure of similarity between graphs, one can then identify extreme events by looking at significant changes in the underlying network structures.
Consider a system that can be represented by a series of complete weighted graphs, where the number of vertices is fixed but the edge weights change over time. Such a representation is a natural choice for those systems where we are interested in modelling the strength of the edges rather than their presence or absence. With this timevarying network to hand, one can look at how it evolves in order to detect anomalies in the system. An example of this type of graph is furnished by financial networks, where each vertex represents a stock and each edge weight measures the association between the time series of the corresponding stock, in terms of correlation [15], Granger causality [16] or transfer entropy [17]. In this domain, extreme events representing financial instability of different stock are of interest [18] and can be inferred by detecting the anomalies in the corresponding networks [15].
Existing methods aim to derive network characteristics based on connectivity structure, or statistics capturing connectivity structure [19, 20, 21]. These methods focus on capturing network substructures using clusters, hubs and communities. Moreover, an alternative principled approach is to characterize the networks using ideas from statistical physics [22, 23]. These methods use the partition function to describe the network, and the associated entropy, energy, and temperature measures can be computed through this function [15, 24, 25]
. Unfortunately, the aforementioned methods tend to characterize network structures in a low dimensional pattern or vector space, and thus discard a lot of structural information. This drawback influences the effectiveness of existing approaches for timevarying network analysis. The aim of this paper is to address this shortcoming of existing methods by means of graph kernels.
Ia Graph Kernels
In machine learning, graph kernels are important tools for analyzing structured data that are represented by graphs. This is because graph kernels not only allow us to map graph structures into a high dimensional space, but also provide a way of making the rapidly developing kernel machinery for vectorial data applicable to graphs. In essence, graph kernels are positive definite similarity measures between pairs of graphs
[5, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. They allow rapidly developing kernelized algorithms (e.g., Support Vector Machines, kernel Principle Component Analysis, etc) for vectorial data associating with vectorial kernels
[33, 34] directly applicable to graph structures.One leading principle for defining kernels between a pair of graphs is to decompose the graphs into substructures and to measure the similarity between the input graphs by enumerating pairs of isomorphic substructures. Specifically, any available graph decomposition method can be adapted to develop a graph kernel, e.g., graph kernels based on counting pairs of isomorphic a) paths [26], b) walks [27, 28], and c) subgraphs or subtrees [29, 30, 31, 32]. Unfortunately, there are two common shortcomings arising with these graph kernels. First, they do not work well on complete weighted graphs, where each pair of vertices is linked by a weighted edge. This is due to the trivial structure of the complete graph, i.e., each vertex is adjacent to all the other vertices, whereas the weights may be quite different. Thus, it is difficult to decompose a complete weighted graph into substructures. On the other hand, identifying the isomorphism between weighted (sub)graphs tends to be computationally burdensome unless the weight information is discarded. Second, graph kernels cannot scale up to large structures. To overcome this issue, existing graph kernels usually compromise and use small sized substructures. However, measuring kernel values with small substructures only partially reflects the topological characteristics of a graph.
To address the restriction of Rconvolution graph kernels to complete weighted graphs, a number of graph kernels [35, 36, 37] based on using the adjacency matrix to capture global graph characteristics have been developed. Since the adjacency matrix directly reflects the edge weight information, these kernels can naturally accommodate complete weighted graphs. For instance, Johansson [35] et al. have developed a family of global graph kernels based on the Lov asz number and its associated orthonormal representation through the adjacency matrix. Xu et al. [36] have proposed a localglobal mixed reproducing kernel based on the approximated von Neumann entropy through the adjacency matrix. Bai et al. [37] have defined an information theoretic kernel based on the classical JensenShannon divergence between the steady state random walk probability distributions obtained through the adjacency matrix. Recently, there has been increasing interests in continuoustime quantum walks [38]
for the analysis of global graph structures. The continuoustime quantum walk is the quantum analogue of the classical continuoustime random walk. Unlike the classical random walk that is governed by a doubly stochastic matrix, the quantum walk is governed by a unitary matrix and is not dominated by the low frequencies of the Laplacian spectrum. Thus, the continuoustime quantum walk is able to better discriminate different graph structures.
There have been a number of graph kernels developed using the continuoustime quantum walk. For instance, Bai et al. [39] have developed a quantum kernel by measuring the similarity between two continuoustime quantum walks evolving on a pair of graphs. Specifically, they associate each graph with a mixed quantum state that represents the evolution of the quantum walk. The resulting kernel is computed by measuring the quantum JensenShannon divergence between the associated density matrices. Rossi et al. [40] have developed a quantum kernel by exploiting the relation between the continuoustime quantum walk intereferences and the symmetries of a pair of graphs, in terms of the quantum JensenShannon divergence. Both of these quantum kernels employ the Laplacian matrix as the required Hamiltonian operator, and thus they can naturally accommodate complete weighted graphs. Unfortunately, all of the aforementioned kernels, either the classical kernels defined through the adjacency matrix or the quantum kernels based on the Laplacian matrix as the Hamiltonian operator, are restricted to unattributed graphs. Furthermore, both quantum kernels require a composite structure of each pair of graphs to compute an additional mixed state that describes a system having equal probability of being in the two original quantum states. Unless, we can make use of the transitive alignment information between the vertices of the two graphs, then neither of the quantum kernels are positive definite.
IB Contributions
In this paper, we aim to address the above mentioned drawbacks of existing stateoftheart graph kernels by proposing a new kernel for complete weighted graphs. We test this similarity measure on graphs extracted from financial time series, as these are typically abstracted using sets of complete weighted graphs. We stress, however, that our kernel can also be applied to general graphs. In Section V we measure the performance of the new kernel on a series of graph embedding and classification tasks, showing that it significantly outperforms a number of widely used alternative kernels.
Given a set of graphs, our aim is to probe each of them using a discretetime quantum walk [41]. The reasons for using a walk of this type are twofold. First, quantum walks possess several exotic properties not exhibited by their classical counterpart. These in turn are a consequence of the marked differences between the two types of walks. For instance, unlike the classical walks the evolution of which is governed by a stochastic matrix, the behaviour of quantum walks is governed by a unitary matrix. As a result of their unique properties, during their evolution, quantum walks produce destructive interference patterns which have been shown to lead to more powerful graph characterisations [41]. Second, unlike continuoustime quantum walks [42], the state space of a discretetime quantum walk is the set of directed edges rather than the set of vertices. In particular, suppose is a sample graph with vertex set and edge set . We replace each edge with a pair of directed edges and , and we denote this set as . Since is the state space of the discretetime quantum walk and its cardinality is much larger than, or at least equal to, that of the vertex set , the discretetime quantum walk can capture the structural characteristics of the graph better than its continuoustime counter part.
Unfortunately, directly simulating the discretetime quantum walk on a complete weighted graph tends to be a challenging problem. The time complexity of simulating the evolution of a discretetime quantum walk is cubic in the size of the state space. For a complete weighted graph having vertices, there are directed edges. Thus, performing the discretetime quantum walk on a complete weighted graph has an associated time complexity of . Consequently, the use of discretetime quantum walks for the analysis of complete weighted graphs is computationally expensive and unadvisable. Most importantly, two complete weighted graphs over the same set of vertices are clearly structurally equivalent. In other words, unless we consider the edge weighted information, these graphs are virtually indistinguishable.
One way to overcome these issues is to compute sparser versions of the original graphs. There have been a number of alternative approaches to extract sparse structures from complete or dense weighted graphs. For instance, Ye et al. [15] and Silva et al. [18] take the widely used thresholdbased approach. That is, they preserve only those edges whose weights fall into the larger of weights. Unfortunately, these methods usually lead to a significant loss of information, since many weighted edges are discarded. Moreover, the resulting structure clearly depends on the choice of the threshold, and it is generally unclear how this threshold should be selected. This in turn results in very unstable and potentially disjoint graphs. Mantegna and Stanley [43] have extracted the minimum spanning tree over the original weighted adjacency matrix. This removes the need of selecting a threshold and the resulting instability, but it still suffers from the information loss problem of thresholdbased methods.
To address the aforementioned problems, in this paper we propose to sparsify the original graph using the minimum spanning tree through the commute time matrix rather than the original weighted adjacency matrix. The commute time averages the time taken for a random walk to travel between a pair of vertices over all connecting paths, and is robust to the deletion of individual edges or paths (i.e., structural noise) unless these form bridges between connected components of a graph [44]. Thus, the resulting spanning tree structure through the commute time matrix not only retains salient structural characteristics of the graph, but also encapsulates proximity information residing on the discarded edges. In other words, we minimize the edge number in the original graph while preserving most of its path structure information. This, as shown in [45], can lead to a significant reduction of the computational complexity when applied to dense graphs. Most importantly, the commute time can easily accommodate weighted information residing on edges. As a result, the commute time not only represents an ideal candidate for sparsifying the structure of the original graph [46], but also allows us to separate otherwise structurally indistinguishable complete graphs.
The aim of this paper is to develop a new kernel for complete weighted graphs associated with discretetime quantum walks. To this end, we propose a new framework of computing this kernel and proceed as follows. Given the commute time spanning tree representations of the original pair of graphs, we first simulate the evolution of a discretetime quantum walk on each of the trees, where we make use of a novel weighted version of the PerronFrobenius operator [47]. This in turn allows us to encode the weights on the edges of the commute time spanning tree in the initial state of the walk. Then, for each discretetime quantum walk, we compute the associated timeaveraged density matrix. Density matrices are matrices that describe quantum systems that are in a statistical mixture of quantum states, and they play a fundamental role in the quantum observation process. In our case, the timeaveraged density matrix describes a statistical ensemble of quantum states encapsulating the timeevolution of a quantum walk. The diagonal of this matrix corresponds to the timeaveraged probability distribution of the walk visiting each arc residing on the edge of the underlying graph. With a pair of density matrices to hand, the kernel between the original graphs is computed as the similarity between the associated timeaveraged probability distributions. We show that the similarity between these distributions can be computed either as the negative exponential of their classical JensenShannon divergence [48] or as their dot product. Both approaches lead to the definition of a positive definite kernel measure. Fig.1 illustrates the structure of the proposed framework to compute the kernel based similarity between two complete weighted graphs. Experiments on financial networks datasets as well as standard graph datasets abstracted from the bioinformatics domain demonstrate the effectiveness of the new kernel.
Finally, note that the proposed kernel is closely related to the kernel we introduced in [45], where we proposed to simplify the structure of the input graphs through commute time, to then compare them using discretetime quantum walks. However, the proposed kernel significantly differs from [45] and has a number of important theoretical advantages. First, the computation of the initial quantum state for the proposed kernel is based on the newly introduced weighted PerronFrobenius operator. As a result, only the proposed kernel can encapsulate the edge weight information of the original graphs. Second, unlike [45], where the similarity between the input graphs is computed using the quantum JensenShannon divergence between the density matrices associated with the graphs, here we look at the classical JensenShannon divergence between the probability distributions associated with these density matrices. In particular, we show that these probability distributions can be easily transformed to distributions over the space of directed edge labels, defined as the union of the original edge and vertex labels, thus allowing this new kernel to incorporate both vertex and edge labels of the original graphs. Finally, in order to compute the divergence between the full density matrices, the kernel in [45] also requires the computation of an additional mixed density matrix for each pair of input graphs. This does not take into account the correspondences between the nodes of the input graphs and thus does not guarantee permutation invariance. On the other hand, we overcome this problem by computing the divergence between probability distributions over a common state space, i.e., the space of directed edge labels. As a result, the proposed kernel is both permutation invariant and positive definite.
The remainder of the paper is organised as follows. Section II introduces the necessary quantum mechanical background, while Section III reviews the concept of commute time and shows how to sparsify a graph using the commute time spanning tree. Section IV introduces the proposed kernel, which is extensively evaluated in Section V. Finally, Section VI concludes the paper.
Ii Quantum Mechanical Background
Iia Discretetime Quantum Walks
In quantum mechanics, discretetime quantum walks are defined as the quantum counterparts of classical discretetime random walks [41]. Quantum processes are reversible, so in quantum walks the states need to specify both the current and the previous locations of the walk. Let us replace each edge with a pair of directed edges and , and denote the new set as . The state space of the discretetime quantum walk is and we represent the state of the quantum walker at as . That is, denotes the state in which the walk is at vertex having previously been at vertex . A general state of the walk is
(1) 
where the quantum amplitudes are complex. The probability that the walk is in state is given by , where is the complex conjugate of .
At each time step, the quantum walk evolution is governed by the transition matrix U, the entries of which indicate the transition probabilities between states, i.e.,
(2) 
Since the walk evolution is linear and conserves probability, U must be an unitary matrix, i.e., the inverse of U is equal to its Hermitian transpose . A typical choice is to choose the Grover matrix [49] as the transition matrix, i.e.,
(3) 
where corresponds to the vertex degree of vertex , indicates the quantum amplitude of the transition , and is the Kronecker delta, i.e., if and otherwise. For each state , U assigns the same amplitude to all transitions , and a different amplitude to the transition , where is a neighbour vertex of . Note that the elements of U are real numbers, and they can be either positive or negative. This indicates that Eq.(3) allows destructive interference to take place as a consequence of negative quantum amplitudes appearing during the walk evolution.
IiB The Weighted PerronFrobenius Operator
In [47], it was shown that there exist an important link between the PerronFrobenius operator and the transition matrix of discretetime quantum walks. To illustrate this linkage, we commence by introducing the concepts of directed line graph and positive support for a matrix.
Definition 1 Let be a given graph, the directed line graph of is a dual representation. To obtain , we replace each edge with a pair of directed edges and for vertices , and we denote this set as . The directed line graph is an oriented graph with vertex set and edge set as
(4) 
where vertices and . Based on [47], the adjacency matrix of is the PerronFrobenius operator.
Definition 2 Assume is a matrix. Its positive support is a matrix with
(5) 
where and .
If U is the unitary matrix of a discretetime quantum walk on the graph , then, based on [47], the PerronFrobenius operator T of can be constructed from the positive support of U, i.e.,
(6) 
For the directed line graph , each vertex corresponds to a unique directed edge, thus the vertex set of essentially corresponds to the state space of the quantum walk. Furthermore, if there exists a directed edge from vertex to vertex , the quantum walk on allows a transition from the directed edge representing to the directed edge representing , and vice versa. These observations indicate that the discretetime quantum walk on the original graph can be seen as a walk evolved on the corresponding directed line graph , where the transitions of the walk are constrained by the directed edges of .
The directed line graph has a number of interesting properties which in turn highlight some advantages of discretetime quantum walks over their classical counterparts. First, the directed line graph can represent the original graph in a higher dimensional feature space. This is because the vertex set of the line graph corresponds to the set of directed edges of the original graph and its cardinality is usually greater than that of the vertex number of the original graph. Thus, compared to the continuoustime quantum walk [39] on the original graph, the discretetime quantum walk on the directed line graph can capture richer structural characteristics. Second, the directed line graph is a backtrackless representation of the original graph structure, because the edges of the line graph are all directed. Since the transitions of the discretetime quantum walk are constrained by the directed edges of the line graph, the walk cannot visit a vertex and then immediately return to the starting vertex through the same edge. As a result, the discretetime quantum walk can significantly reduce the notorious tottering problem of the classical random walk [28]. Finally, since the discretetime quantum walk and the directed line graph are related, the initial state of the quantum walk can be computed through the PerronFrobenius operator T of the line graph [45]. Unfortunately, the operator T cannot reflect weight information residing on the edges of the original graph and thus its use leads to information loss. To overcome this shortcoming, we propose a new weighted PerronFrobenius operator for the directed line graph. We compute the initial state by taking the square root of the sum of the outdegree and indegree distributions from the new weighted operator.
Definition 3 (Initial State from Directed Line Graphs) Let be a graph with weighted adjacency matrix , the set of directed edges for , and () the directed line graph of . Each element of the weighted PerronFrobenius operator of satisfies
(7) 
where , and are the weights of and , , and . The initial state for through is
(8) 
where
(9) 
The initial state not only preserves the structural information of , but also encapsulates the edge weight information in the original graph .
IiC From Quantum Walks to Density Matrices
In quantum mechanics [47], a quantum system can be in a statistical ensemble of pure quantum states, where each pure state is described as a single ket vector and has an associated probability . The density matrix of this quantum system is . Consider a sample graph and let be the pure state that corresponds to a discretetime quantum walk evolved from time step to time step on . The timeaveraged density matrix for associated with the quantum walk is defined as , since the state at time can be computed by , where is the initial state of the quantum walk, and U is the transition matrix. Given the initial state , can be rewritten as
(10) 
where is defined in Def.3 through the weighted PerronFrobenius operator. describes a quantum system that consists of a family of equally probable pure states, which are defined by the quantum walk evolution from time step to . Furthermore, we can compute the timeaveraged probability of the quantum walk visiting
(11) 
where and indexes .
Iii Graph Simplification through Commute Time
The aim of this paper is to develop a novel similarity measure between complete weighted graphs. Directly simulating the evolution of a discretetime quantum walk on these graphs tends to be elusive, due to the high computational complexity. To overcome this problem, we propose to sparsify the original graphs through the commute time matrix [44].
We first review the concept of commute time. Let be a set of complete weighted graphs. Assume is a sample graph from with an edge weight function . If or , there exists an undirected edge between vertices and , i.e., and are adjacent. Let denote the adjacency matrix of , with entries . The degree matrix of is a diagonal matrix, where each diagonal entry is computed by summing the corresponding row or column of , i.e., . Then, the graph Laplacian matrix is computed by subtracting from , i.e., . The spectral decomposition of is defined as , where is a
diagonal matrix with ascending eigenvalues as elements, i.e.,
, and is a matrixwith the corresponding ordered eigenvectors as columns. The hitting time
between a pair of vertices and of is defined as the expected number of steps of a random walk starting from to . Similarly, the commute time is computed as the expected number of steps of the walk starting from to , and then returning to , i.e., . The commute time can be computed in terms of the unnormalized Laplacian eigendecomposition [44](12) 
Similarly to [46], we propose to simplify the graph structure by computing a modified commute time spanning tree and reduce the number of edges to . More specifically, for a complete weighted graph and its weighted adjacency matrix , we first compute its commute time matrix and its associated modified commute time matrix , where . We then use as the new adjacency matrix of . Based on Kruskal’s method [50], we compute the minimum spanning tree over , where .
Discussion The commute time provides a number of theoretical advantages. First, the commute time amplifies the affinity between pairwise vertices [51] and is robust under the perturbation of the graph structure [44]. Thus, the minimum spanning tree constructed on the modified commute time matrix can reflect the dominant structural information of the original graph , while yielding a sparser structure [46]. Second, as we have stated, the minimum spanning tree can reduce the edge number of to . There will be directed edges in , thus evolving the discretetime quantum walk on the spanning tree has time complexity . This is because the computation of the commute time matrix is based on the eigendecomposition of the normalized Laplacian. Note that this represents a considerable improvement from the original time complexity of simulating the quantum walk on the original graph . Third, the commute time can accommodate the weighted information residing on the graph edges, since it can be computed in terms of the unnormalized Laplacian matrix through the weighted adjacency matrix [44]. Fourth, the spanning tree is a simplified structure of the original graph and some weighted edges of the original graph are not encapsulated in the spanning trees. However, since the commute time is defined as the expected step number of the random walk departing from one vertex and returning to the same vertex [52], i.e., the commute time reflects the integrated effectiveness of all possible paths between pairwise vertices of the original graph [44]. Thus, the weighted edges of the spanning tree from the modified commute time matrix can also reflect the weighted information of deleted edges in the original graph. In summary, the minimum spanning tree provides an elegant way to probe the structure of complete weighted graphs using discretetime quantum walks.
Iv A Kernel for Complete Weighted Graphs
In this section we introduce the proposed graph kernel. Given a set of complete weighted graphs, we show that we can associate with each graph a probability distribution over the directed edge labels, which is induced by the timeaverage probability distribution of the discretetime quantum walk defined in Section II. Then, we define two kernels between a pair of graphs in terms of the similarity between the corresponding distributions over the directed edge labels. An instance of computing the proposed kernels between pairwise graphs are exhibited in Fig.2.
Iva The JensenShannon Divergence
The JensenShannon divergence is a nonextensive mutual information measure defined between probability distributions [53]. Let and be a pair of probability distributions, then the divergence measure between the distributions is
(13) 
where is the Shannon entropy associated with . is always negative definite, symmetric, well defined, and bounded, i.e., .
IvB The Proposed Graph Kernel Over Directed Edge Labels
Let denote a set of complete weighted graphs. For a sample graph , we first transform into a minimum spanning tree over its modified commute time matrix, based on the method introduced in Section III. Note that the edges of the commute time spanning tree are attributed with the modified commute time between the corresponding pair of vertices. Let be the directed edges set of . Based on Section II, we simulate the discretetime quantum walk on the spanning tree , and we associate with each directed edge () the timeaverage probability from the quantum walk. Let be the discrete label associated with the vertex . The directed edge label of is the label union of the start vertex and end vertex , i.e.,
(14) 
Note that, the resided edge of on the original graph may also have discrete label . For this instance, can be rewritten as
(15) 
Thus, we can simultaneously accommodate both discrete vertex and edge labels. Let L be the set of all possible directed edge labels and is a label. We assign the probability
(16) 
where each satisfies . Note that, for a graph, if the edge label does not exist, .
Let and denote a pair of graphs, and and the associated minimum spanning trees. Based on Eq.(16), we compute the probability distributions over directed edge labels as
and
associated with the quantum walks on and .
Given this setting, we propose to compute the kernel between and in terms of the similarity between and . We consider two alternative ways of computing this similarity, both resulting in a positive definite kernel.
1) Measuring Similarity Using the Dot Product:
Recall that a graph kernel is a positive definite similarity measure which corresponds to the dot product between graphs in an implicit feature space. If we consider and as the feature space embeddings of and , then the kernel between them can be defined as
(17) 
where denotes the dot product. The positive definiteness of the kernel trivially follows from Eq.(17). Note that in theory one can employ any standard vectorbased kernel measure between the probability distributions and
as the similarity measure, e.g., the Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel
[54], Laplacian kernel [55], etc. However, these vectorial kernels are instances of parametric kernels, i.e., they introduce additional parameters that need to be adjusted in order to achieve the best performance. By contrast, the kernel defined in Eq.(17) is parameterfree and thus does not require the manual setup of additional parameters during the kernel computation2) Measuring Similarity Using the JS Divergence: Based on Eq.(13), the graph kernel between and associated with the JensenShannon divergence is defined as
(18) 
where is a composite probability distribution and is computed over the same label . In other words, the similarity between the input graphs is defined in terms of the similarity between the probability distributions over their labels. Note that since these probability distributions are computed over the space of directed edges labels (and not the directed edges themselves), we do not require the two graphs to have the same number of edges.
To see why Eq.(IVB) defines a positive definite kernel, recall that the JensenShannon divergence between probability distributions is a symmetric dissimilarity measure [48]. Since the kernel is computed as the negative exponential of the divergence measure, it follows that it is positive definite.
The computational complexity of both kernels is the same. Let be the maximum number of vertices in a pair of graphs. Then computing or between these graphs has time complexity . In fact, the cost of computing the kernels is dominated by simulating the discretetime quantum walk on the spanning trees extracted from the original graphs, and this has time complexity , as explained in Section III.
Finally, note that the computation of discards any information on a label if this does not appear in both input graphs. For instance, given two graphs and , if the label appears in but not in , we have and . As a result, by taking the dot product between the probability vectors, the label will not influence the resulting kernel value. By contrast, in the computation of we make use of all labels, including those that appear in only one of the two input graphs. This in turn suggests that may potentially reflect richer graph characteristics than for some instances.
IvC Discussions and Related Works
Property  The Proposed Kernels  QJSK [42]  QJSKT [45]  QEMK [56] 

Permutation Invariant  
Time Complexity for N Graphs  
Time Complexity for Pairwise Graphs  
Positive Definite  
Accommodate Attributed Graphs  
Accommodate Edge Weights 
The proposed graph kernels are related to the quantum JensenShannon kernel (QJSK) [42] and its faster variant (QJSKT) [45], as well as the quantum edgebased matching kernel (QEMK) [56]. All these kernels use discretetime quantum walks to probe the graph structure. Moreover, the proposed kernels are also similar to the QJSKT kernel, which is also based on the spanning trees extracted from original graph through the commute time. Thus, the QJSKT kernel for a pair of graphs both having vertices also has time complexity . This is significantly more efficient than the QJSK kernel that requires time complexity . However, there are five significant theoretical differences between the proposed kernels and these kernels. These differences are listed in Table I and discussed as follows.
First, as we have stated in Section III, the minimum spanning tree, which is extracted from the original graph through the commute time, can reflect weight information residing on the edges of the original graph. Thus, unlike the QJSK kernel between original graphs, the proposed kernels between commute time spanning trees not only overcome the shortcoming of inefficiency, but also encapsulate the edge weight information of original graphs through the proposed weighted PerronFrobenius operator.
Second, like the proposed kernels, the QJSKT kernel is also defined on the commute time spanning tree and requires the same time complexity for a pair of graphs. The computation of the initial quantum state of the QJSKT kernel is based on the unweighted PerronFrobenius operator rather then the weighted operator. This is similar to the QJSK kernel. Thus, unlike the proposed kernels, the QJSKT kernel ignores edge weight information of the spanning trees, i.e., it does not reflect the edge weight information of the original graphs.
Third, unlike the QJSKT and QJSK kernels, the proposed kernels are based on the dot product and the classical JensenShannon divergence between probability distributions over directed edge labels, respectively. These distributions, on the other hand, correspond to the diagonals of the density operators of the discretetime quantum walks. Since the labels for the proposed kernels are computed by taking the union of the corresponding vertex/edge labels, the proposed kernels can also accommodate vertex/edge attributed graphs. By contrast, the QJSKT and QJSK kernels are based on the quantum JensenShannon divergence [45] between the density operators associated with the discretetime quantum walks. This in turn requires computing their eigendecomposition, which has time complexity . On the other hand, both the dot product and the classical JensenShannon divergence between a pair of probability distributions have time complexity . As a result, for a set of graphs each having vertices, the proposed kernels only have time complexity . This is significantly more efficient than the QJSKT kernel, which has time complexity .
Fourth, both the QJSKT kernel and the QJSK kernel require computing a composite density operator from the pair of density operator under comparisons. However, when computing this composite density operator both kernels do not take into account the correspondences between the vertices of the directed line graphs, i.e., the directed edges residing on the original graph edges. As a result, neither kernel is permutation invariant. By contrast, in the proposed kernels we overcome the problem by comparing probability distributions over the space of the directed edge labels. The proposed kernels are thus permutation invariant, since permuting the directed edge order (i.e., the adjacency matrix of the corresponding directed line graph) does not change its set of directed edge labels. In other words, our kernels gives a more precise kernel based similarity measure than the QJSKT and QJSK kernels.
Finally, like the QJSK kernel, the QEMK kernel also involves evolving a discretetime quantum walk, but on the original graph. Thus, the QEMK kernel also suffers from the inefficiency of simulating quantum walks on the original graph. Moreover, computing the QEMK kernel between a pair of graphs requires aligning their vertices through their depthbased representations [45]. Since this alignment step is not guaranteed to be transitive, the resulting kernel is not positive definite (pd) [57]. By contrast, the proposed kernels are pd.
V Experiments
As an example of a complete weighted network, we consider the case of timevarying financial networks. The NYSE dataset consists of a series of networks for each trading day abstracted from the closing price of stocks from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) database [18], which consists of 3799 stocks and their associated daily prices. The stock prices were obtained from the Yahoo financial dataset (http://finance.yahoo.com) [15]. To extract the network representations, we select 347 stocks that were traded from January 1986 to February 2011, i.e., for a total of 6004 days. We select a period of 28 days as the time window to analyse the similarity of the closing prices of different stocks and we move this window along the 6004 trading days to construct a time varying sequence of stock prices. More specifically, each chronological window of the sequence encapsulates a time series of stock return values over a corresponding period of 28 days. For each time window, i.e., each trading day, we represent the trades between each pair of stock as a network where the connection weight between two stocks is the Euclidean distance between their time series. The resulting structure is a timevarying network on 347 vertices over 5976 days. Note that each network is a complete weighted graph, and each vertex label corresponds to a corresponding stock name (the edges do not have discrete labels). To our knowledge, the aforementioned existing stateoftheart Rconvolution graph kernels cannot directly accommodate this kind of structures, since none of them can deal with complete weighted graphs.
Va Evaluations of the Network Entropy
We commence by investigating the Shannon entropies associated with the directed edge label probability distributions induced by the discretetime quantum walks. These entropies play a significant role in determining the kernel performance. Specifically, we explore the evolutionary behavior of the NYSE stock market by computing the entropy of the time varying financial networks at each time step. This allows us to investigate whether the evolutionary behaviour can be understood through the variation of the network entropy, i.e., we aim to analyze whether abrupt changes in network structure or different evolutionary epochs can be characterized by the entropy measure. Note that, we evolve the quantum walks from
to , i.e., we set the maximum as , because the Shannon entropy computed through the quantum walk tends to reach a limiting value when . The results are shown in Fig. 3, where the xaxis represents the date (time) and the yaxis represents entropy values. Fig. 3 indicates that most of the significant fluctuations in the entropy time series correspond to different financial crises, e.g., Black Monday [58], the Friday the 13th minicrash [59], the Dotcom Bubble Burst, the Mexico Financial Crisis, the Iraq War, and the Subprime Crisis [60], etc. This is because the timevarying financial network experiences dramatic structural changes when a financial crisis occurs. For instance, some significant Internet companies that led to a rapid increase of both market confidence and stock prices were identified during the period of the Dotcom Bubble [61]. This noticeably modified the subsequent relations between stock, and this phenomenon can be captured by examining the variation of the Shannon entropy values.Note that, although Fig. 3 demonstrates that the entropy is effective in detecting the extreme events in the financial network evolution, the time series is one dimensional and hence overlooks information concerning detailed changes in network structure. By contrast, the proposed quantum walk kernels can map the network structures into a high dimensional space by kernelizing the entropy and better preserve structural information contained in the networks.
VB Quantum Kernel Embeddings from kPCA
In this subsection, we explore the effectiveness of the proposed quantum kernels on the NYSE dataset. To this end, we apply the new kernels to the timevarying financial networks with the objective of analyzing whether abrupt changes in network evolution can be distinguished. Note that in the remainder of this subsection we choose to show only the results for the kernel based on the dot product, as we observed that these were very similar to the ones computed using the JensenShannon divergence and the computation is faster.
We commence by setting for the evolution of the required discretetime quantum walks. We perform kernel Principle Component Analysis (kPCA) [62] on the kernel matrix of the financial networks (from January 1986 to February 2011) using the proposed kernel, and we embed the networks into a 3dimensional component space. The results from the kPCA are visualized using the first three principal components and are exhibited in Fig. 4(a). Moreover, we compare the proposed quantum kernel with four stateoftheart kernels, i.e., the WeisfeilerLehman subtree kernel (WLSK) [30], the JensenShannon graph kernel (JSGK) [37], the quantum JensenShannon kernel (QJS) [39] and the feature space Laplacian graph kernel (FLGK) [63]. Note that, the WLSK is an instance of the Rconvolution kernel, and it cannot accommodate either complete weighted graphs or weighted graphs. Thus, we apply the WLSK kernel to the transformed commute time spanning trees and ignore the weight information on the tree edges. The JSGK kernel is a mutual information kernel associated with the steady state random walk, the QJS kernel is a quantum kernel associated with the continuoustime quantum walk, and the FLGK kernel is a global kernel associated with the Laplacian matrix. Since all the JSGK, QJS and FLGK kernels can accommodate edge weight, we directly apply these kernels to the original financial networks. Moreover, since each vertex label appears just once for each network, we establish the required correspondences between a pair of networks through the vertex labels for the JSGK and QJS kernels. We also perform kPCA on the resulting kernel matrices and embed the networks into a 3dimensional principal component space. The embedding results for the WLSK, JSGK, QJS and FLGK kernels are visualized in Fig. 4(b), 4(c), 4(d) and 4(e). The plots in Fig. 4 indicate the paths of the timevarying financial networks in the different kernel spaces over 5976 trading days. The color bar beside each plot represents the date in the time series. It is clear that the embedding given by the proposed kernel shows a better manifold structure. Moreover, an interesting phenomenon in Figs.4(a) and 4(b) is that networks from Jan 1986 to Feb 2011 are well divided into two clusters. The clusters found by our kernel are better separated.
To take this study one step further, we show in detail the kPCA embeddings during four different financial crisis periods. Specifically, Fig. 5(a) corresponds to the Black Monday period (from 15th Jun 1987 to 17th Feb 1988), Fig. 5(b) to the Dotcom Bubble period (from 3rd Jan 1995 to 31st Dec 2001), Fig. 5(c) to the Enron Incident period (the red points, from 16th Oct 2001 to 11th Mar 2002), and Fig. 5(d) to the Subprime Crisis period (from 2nd Jan 2006 to 1st Jul 2009). Fig. 5(a) indicates that Black Monday (17th Oct, 1987) is a crucial financial event, as the network embedding points before and after the event are divided into two clusters. Similarly, Fig. 5 indicates that the Dotcom Bubble Burst (13rd Mar, 2000) in Fig. 5(b), the Enron Incident period (from 2nd Dec 2001 to 11th Mar 2002) in Fig. 5(c), the New Century Financial crisis (4th April, 2007) and the First Trading Day after G7 Finance Meeting (2nd Nov, 2008) in Fig. 5(d) are also crucial financial events. The network embedding points before and after these events are separated into distinct clusters. Moreover, points corresponding to the crucial events are midway between the two clusters. Another interesting feature in Fig. 5(c) is that the networks between 1986 and 2011 are separated by the Prosecution against Arthur Andersen (3rd Nov, 2002). The prosecution is closely related to the Enron Incident. As a result, the Enron Incident can be seen as a watershed at the beginning of 21st century, that significantly distinguishes the financial networks of the 21st and 20th centuries.
Similar embeddings are also found for a) the WLSK kernel in Fig. 6, b) the JSGK kernel in Fig. 7, c) the QJS kernel in Fig. 8, and d) the FLGK kernel in Fig. 9. We observe that the proposed kernel outperforms the WLSK, JSGK, QJS and FLGK kernels in terms of the distributions of networks. More specifically, for the proposed quantum kernel, the boundaries between clusters are clear and the clusters are tighter. The reasons for this are threefold. First, unlike the proposed kernel, the WLSK kernel cannot encapsulate weight information residing on the edges. As a result, the WLSK kernel may lose important information from the financial networks. Second, the state space of the discretetime quantum walk is larger than that of the steady state random walk and the continuoustime quantum walk, and thus can reflect more topological information. Moreover, the discretetime quantum walk can limit the tottering problem arising in the classical random walk. As a result, the proposed quantum kernel can reflect richer characteristics than the JSGK and QJS kernels. Third, the discretetime quantum walk can reflect more information of a network structure than its simple Laplacian matrix. As a result, the proposed kernel can better discriminate different financial network structures than the FLGK kernel. The above observations demonstrate that our kernel can distinguish different types of network evolution for timevarying financial networks, and outperforms stateoftheart methods.
Since the commute time minimum spanning tree plays an important role in determining the performance of the proposed quantum kernel, we also provide experiments to demonstrate the advantage of using this kind of tree structures. Our experiments demonstrate that when the minimum spanning trees are abstracted through the commute time matrix, they can better preserve the graph characteristics than those abstracted through the original graph adjacency matrix. Moreover, to further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed kernel, we also evaluate its performance on timevarying financial networks where the edges are weighted according to the correlation instead of the Euclidean distance between the corresponding time series. The experimental results demonstrate again that the proposed kernel can outperform alternative methods on this kind of financial networks. Indeed, only the proposed kernel can simultaneously preserve the network characteristics in the Hilbert space and accommodate the edge weights. Due to the limit space of this manuscript, the results of these experimental evaluations are included in the supplementary materials.
VC Experiments on General Graphs
We conclude our experiments by showing the classification performance of the proposed kernels on more general standard graph datasets abstracted from the field of bioinformatics. These datasets include the MUTAG, PPIs(Proteobacteria40 PPIs and Acidobacteria46 PPIs), PTC(MR) and NCI1 datasets and their information is shown in Table II. More introduction of these datasets can be found in [45]. Note that, unlike the timevarying networks, the graphs from these datasets are neither edge weighted nor completed graphs. To accommodate these graphs using the proposed kernels, we proceed as follows. For each graph, we first compute its commute time matrix, and assign each edge a weight using the commute time value between the pair of vertices connected by the edge, i.e., we transform each original graph into a weighted graph by assigning each original edge a weight using the corresponding commute time value. If the ratio between the edge and vertex number of the graph is larger than (i.e., the graph is dense), we compute the weighted minimum spanning tree over its weighted adjacency matrix as the new graph structure. We measure the kernel values using the proposed kernels between the original or sparsified structures. Furthermore we also strengthen the labels using the WeisfeilerLehman (WL) method [64] based on different iterations . Recall that the WL method consists of the repeated propagation of the label information of a vertex to its neighbours, and when the strengthened vertex labels are the original vertex labels. In our experiments, we set the largest value of as 3, and compute the kernel matrix using each of the proposed kernels associated with all strengthened vertex labels by varying from 0 to 3. Note that, when no vertex labels are available, each vertex is first labelled with its degree before applying the WL strengthening approach. Finally, note that since each graph of the MUTAG dataset has an original discrete edge label, the required directed edge label is computed as in Eq.(15). For the remaining datasets, the required directed edge label is computed as in Eq.(14).
Datasets  MUTAG  PPIs  PTC  NCI1 

Max # vertices  111  
Min # vertices  3  
Avg # vertices  29.87  
Max # edges  119  
Min # edges  2  
Avg # edges  32.30  
# graphs  4110  
# classes  2  
Avg # edges/Avg # vertices 
Datasets  MUTAG  PPIs  PTC  NCI1 

WLSK  
QJSK  
QJSKT  
SPGK  
JSGK  
BRWK 
Datasets  MUTAG  PPIs  PTC  NCI1 

WLSK  
QJSK  
QJSKT  
SPGK  
JSGK  
BRWK 
We compare the performance of the proposed kernels and with that of several alternative stateoftheart graph kernels. In addition to the kernels considered in the previous subsections, i.e., the WLSK [64], the JSGK [37], the QJSK [42], and the QJSKT [45], we consider the widely adopted shortest path graph kernel (SPGK) [26], and the backtrackless version of the random walk kernel (BRWK) [65]. For each dataset, we report the average classification accuracies ( standard error) and the time usage of computing the kernel matrices for each kernel in Table III. The results are computed by performing a fold crossvalidation using a CSupport Vector Machine (CSVM) to evaluate the classification accuracies of the different kernels. For each class, we used 90% of the samples for training and the remaining 10% for testing. The parameters of the CSVMs are optimized separately on the training set for each dataset.
Table III shows that the proposed kernels outperform the alternative kernels on any dataset. Although our kernel measures are faster to compute than both the QJSK, the QJSKT, and the BRWK, the proposed kernel through the JensenShannon divergence has a significantly higher runtime than the WLSK kernel and the JSGK kernel. However our kernels can still complete the computation in polynomial time, while yielding a better classification performance. This effectiveness is due to the fact that only the proposed kernels can accommodate both the original edge and vertex labels, e.g, on the MUTAG dataset. Moreover, only the proposed kernels can accommodate the edge weights through the commute time and reflect more graph characteristics than the alternative kernels.
Vi Conclusion
In this paper, we have proposed a new kernel measure for complete weighted graphs based on discretetime quantum walks. Unlike existing stateoftheart graph kernels, our kernel can accommodate complete weighted graphs, while at the same time overcoming the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of discretetime quantum walks on these graphs. Experiments on timevarying financial networks abstracted from the New York Stock Exchange database as well as standard bionformatics graph datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our kernel.
Our future work aims to extend the discretetime quantum walk kernel for hypergraphbased timevarying financial networks. Ren et al. [66] have explored the use of the directed line graph representations for hypergraphs that can reflect richer highorder information than graphs. As we have stated, the discretetime quantum walk can be seen as a walk evolving on directed line graphs. Thus, it would be interesting to extend these works by comparing the quantum walks on the directed line graphs associated with a pair of hypergraphbased timevarying financial networks.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 61602535 and 61503422), the Open Project Program of the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (NLPR), and the program for innovation research in Central University of Finance and Economics. Corresponding author: Lixin Cui, Email: cuilixin@cufe.edu.cn.
References
 [1] J. Wu, S. Pan, X. Zhu, and Z. Cai, “Boosting for multigraph classification,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 430–443, 2015.
 [2] X. Li, Z. Han, L. Wang, and H. Lu, “Visual tracking via random walks on graph model,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2144–2155, 2016.
 [3] J. Tang, L. Shao, X. Li, and K. Lu, “A local structural descriptor for image matching via normalized graph laplacian embedding,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 410–420, 2016.
 [4] J. Xuan, J. Lu, G. Zhang, and X. Luo, “Topic model for graph mining,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2792–2803, 2015.
 [5] K. Riesen and H. Bunke, “Graph classification by means of lipschitz embedding,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1472–1483, 2009.
 [6] A. Sanfeliu and K. Fu, “A distance measure between attributed relational graphs for pattern recognition,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 353–362, 1983.
 [7] J. Zhang and M. Small, “Complex network from pseudoperiodic time series: Topology versus dynamics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, p. 238701, 2006.
 [8] G. Nicolis, A. G. Cantu, and C. Nicolis, “Dynamical aspects of interaction networks,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 15, p. 3467, 2005.
 [9] Y. Shimada, T. Kimura, and T. Ikeguchi, “Analysis of chaotic dynamics using measures of the complex network theory,” in Proceedings of ICANN, 2008, pp. 61–70.

[10]
H. Bunke, P. J. Dickinson, A. Humm, C. Irniger, and M. Kraetzl, “Graph
sequence visualisation and its application to computer network monitoring and
abnormal event detection,” in
Applied Graph Theory in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, 2007, pp. 227–245.  [11] P. Shoubridge, M. Kraetzl, W. D. Wallis, and H. Bunke, “Detection of abnormal change in a time series of graphs,” Journal of Interconnection Networks, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 85–101, 2002.
 [12] H. Bunke, P. J. Dickinson, and M. Kraetzl, “Comparison of two different prediction schemes for the analysis of time series of graphs,” in Proceedings of IbPRIA II, 2005, pp. 99–106.

[13]
H. Bunke, P. J. Dickinson, C. Irniger, and M. Kraetzl, “Analysis of time series of graphs: Prediction of node presence by means of decision tree learning,” in
Proceedings of MLDM, 2005, pp. 366–375.  [14] E. Bullmore and O. Sporns, “Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 186–198, 2009.
 [15] C. Ye, C. H. Comin, T. K. Peron, F. N. Silva, F. A. Rodrigues, L. da F. Costa, A. Torsello, and E. R. Hancock, “Thermodynamic characterization of networks using graph polynomials,” Physical Review E, vol. 92, no. 3, p. 032810, 2015.
 [16] T. Vỳrost, Š. Lyócsa, and E. Baumöhl, “Granger causality stock market networks: Temporal proximity and preferential attachment,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 427, pp. 262–276, 2015.
 [17] L. Sandoval, “Structure of a global network of financial companies based on transfer entropy,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 4443–4482, 2014.
 [18] F. N. Silva, C. H. Comin, T. K. Peron, F. A. Rodrigues, C. Ye, R. C. Wilson, E. R. Hancock, and L. da F. Costa, “Modular dynamics of financial market networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.05040, 2015.
 [19] D. P. Feldman and J. P. Crutchfield, “Measures of statistical complexity: Why?” Physics Letters A, vol. 238, no. 4, pp. 244–252, 1998.
 [20] K. Anand, G. Bianconi, and S. Severini, “Shannon and von neumann entropy of random networks with heterogeneous expected degree,” Physical Review E, vol. 83, no. 3, p. 036109, 2011.
 [21] K. Anand, D. Krioukov, and G. Bianconi, “Entropy distribution and condensation in random networks with a given degree distribution,” Physical Review E, vol. 89, no. 6, p. 062807, 2014.
 [22] K. Huang, Statistical Mechanic. Wiley, New York, 1987.
 [23] M. A. Javarone and G. Armano, “Quantumclassical transitions in complex networks,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2013, no. 04, p. 04019, 2013.
 [24] J.C. Delvenne and A.S. Libert, “Centrality measures and thermodynamic formalism for complex networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 83, no. 4, p. 046117, 2011.
 [25] A. Fronczak, P. Fronczak, and J. A. Hołyst, “Thermodynamic forces, flows, and onsager coefficients in complex networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 76, no. 6, p. 061106, 2007.
 [26] K. M. Borgwardt and H.P. Kriegel, “Shortestpath kernels on graphs,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2005, pp. 74–81.
 [27] T. Gärtner, P. Flach, and S. Wrobel, “On graph kernels: Hardness results and efficient alternatives,” in Proceedings of COLT, 2003, pp. 129–143.
 [28] H. Kashima, K. Tsuda, and A. Inokuchi, “Marginalized kernels between labeled graphs,” in Proceedings of ICML, 2003, pp. 321–328.
 [29] L. Bai and E. R. Hancock, “Fast depthbased subgraph kernels for unattributed graphs,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 50, pp. 233–245, 2016.
 [30] N. Shervashidze, S. Vishwanathan, K. M. T. Petri, and K. M. Borgwardt, “Efficient graphlet kernels for large graph comparison,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 5, pp. 488–495, 2009.
 [31] L. Bai, L. Rossi, Z. Zhang, and E. R. Hancock, “An aligned subtree kernel for weighted graphs,” in Proceedings of ICML, 2015, pp. 30–39.
 [32] Z. Harchaoui and F. Bach, “Image classification with segmentation graph kernels,” in Proceedings of CVPR, 2007.
 [33] Y. Han, K. Yang, Y. Ma, and G. Liu, “Localized multiple kernel learning via samplewise alternating optimization,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 137–148, 2014.
 [34] X. Liu, L. Wang, J. Yin, E. Zhu, and J. Zhang, “An efficient approach to integrating radius information into multiple kernel learning,” IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 557–569, 2013.
 [35] F. D. Johansson, V. Jethava, D. P. Dubhashi, and C. Bhattacharyya, “Global graph kernels using geometric embeddings,” in Proceedings of ICML, 2014, pp. 694–702.
 [36] L. Xu, X. Niu, J. Xie, A. Abel, and B. Luo, “A local–global mixed kernel with reproducing property,” Neurocomputing, vol. 168, pp. 190–199, 2015.
 [37] L. Bai and E. R. Hancock, “Graph kernels from the jensenshannon divergence,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 60–69, 2013.
 [38] E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, “Quantum computation and decision trees,” Physical Review A, vol. 58, p. 915, 1998.
 [39] L. Bai, L. Rossi, A. Torsello, and E. R. Hancock, “A quantum jensenshannon graph kernel for unattributed graphs,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 344–355, 2015.
 [40] L. Rossi, A. Torsello, and E. R. Hancock, “Measuring graph similarity through continuoustime quantum walks and the quantum jensenshannon divergence,” Physical Review E, vol. 91, no. 2, p. 022815, 2015.
 [41] D. Emms, S. Severini, R. C. Wilson, and E. R. Hancock, “Coined quantum walks lift the cospectrality of graphs and trees,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1988–2002, 2009.
 [42] L. Bai, L. Rossi, P. Ren, Z. Zhang, and E. R. Hancock, “A quantum jensenshannon graph kernel using discretetime quantum walks,” in Proceedings of GbRPR, 2015, pp. 252–261.
 [43] R. N. Mantegna and H. E. Stanley, Introduction to econophysics: correlations and complexity in finance. Cambridge university press, 1999.
 [44] H. Qiu and E. R. Hancock, “Clustering and embedding using commute times,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1873–1890, 2007.
 [45] L. Bai, L. Rossi, L. Cui, Z. Zhang, P. Ren, X. Bai, and E. R. Hancock, “Quantum kernels for unattributed graphs using discretetime quantum walks,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 87, pp. 96–103, 2017.
 [46] H. Qiu and E. R. Hancock, “Graph simplification and matching using commute times,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2874–2889, 2007.
 [47] P. Ren, T. Aleksic, D. Emms, R. C. Wilson, and E. R. Hancock, “Quantum walks, ihara zeta functions and cospectrality in regular graphs,” Quantum Information Process, vol. 10, pp. 405–417, 2011.
 [48] A. Majtey, P. Lamberti, and D. Prato, “Jensenshannon divergence as a measure of distinguishability between mixed quantum states,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, p. 052310, 2005.

[49]
L. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search,” in
Proceedings of ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computation
, 1996, pp. 212–219.  [50] J. B. Kruskal, “On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem,” in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1956, pp. 7:48–50.

[51]
I. Fischer and I. Fischer, “Amplifying the block matrix structure for spectral clustering,” in
In Proceedings of IDSIA, 2005, pp. 21–28. 
[52]
D. Levin, Y. Peres, and y. . . E.L. Wilmer title = Markov Chains and Mixing Times, journal = American Mathematical Society.
 [53] A. F. Martins, N. A. Smith, E. P. Xing, P. M. Aguiar, and M. A. Figueiredo, “Nonextensive information theoretic kernels on measures,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 10, pp. 935–975, 2009.
 [54] K. Chung, W. Kao, C. Sun, L. Wang, and C. Lin, “Radius margin bounds for support vector machines with the RBF kernel,” Neural Computation, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 2643–2681, 2003.
 [55] M. R. Hajiaboli, M. O. Ahmad, and C. Wang, “An edgeadapting laplacian kernel for nonlinear diffusion filters,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1561–1572, 2012.
 [56] L. Bai, Z. Zhang, P. Ren, L. Rossi, and E. R. Hancock, “An edgebased matching kernel through discretetime quantum walks,” in Processings of ICIAP I, 2015, pp. 27–38.
 [57] H. Fröhlich, J. K. Wegner, F. Sieker, and A. Zell, “Optimal assignment kernels for attributed molecular graphs,” in Proceedings of ICML, 2005, pp. 225–232.
 [58] E. S. Browning, “Exorcising ghosts of octobers past,” The Wall Street Journal, pp. C1–C2, 2007.
 [59] D. Jenkins, Handbook of Airline Economics. Aviation Week A Division of McGrawHill, New York, 2002.
 [60] C. Mollenkamp, S. Craig, S. Ng, and A. Lucchetti, “Lehman files for bankruptcy, merrill sold, aig seeks cash,” The Wall Street Journal, 2008.
 [61] K. Anderson, C. Brooks, and A. Katsaris, “Speculative bubbles in the s&p 500: Was the tech bubble confined to the tech sector?” Journal of empirical finance, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 345–361, 2010.
 [62] I. H. Witten, E. Frank, and M. A. Hall, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2011.
 [63] R. Kondor and H. Pan, “The multiscale laplacian graph kernel,” in Proceedings of NIPS, 2016, pp. 2982–2990.
 [64] N. Shervashidze, P. Schweitzer, E. J. van Leeuwen, K. Mehlhorn, and K. M. Borgwardt, “Weisfeilerlehman graph kernels,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 1, pp. 1–48, 2010.

[65]
F. Aziz, R. C. Wilson, and E. R. Hancock, “Backtrackless walks on a graph,”
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 977–989, 2013.  [66] P. Ren, T. Aleksic, R. C. Wilson, and E. R. Hancock, “A polynomial characterization of hypergraphs using the ihara zeta function,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1941–1957, 2011.
Comments
There are no comments yet.