A proof complexity conjecture and the Incompleteness theorem

03/19/2023
by   Jan Krajicek, et al.
0

Given a sound first-order p-time theory T capable of formalizing syntax of first-order logic we define a p-time function g_T that stretches all inputs by one bit and we use its properties to show that T must be incomplete. We leave it as an open problem whether for some T the range of g_T intersects all infinite NP sets (i.e. whether it is a proof complexity generator hard for all proof systems). A propositional version of the construction shows that at least one of the following three statements is true: - there is no p-optimal propositional proof system (this is equivalent to the non-existence of a time-optimal propositional proof search algorithm), - E ⊈P/poly, - there exists function h that stretches all inputs by one bit, is computable in sub-exponential time and its range Rng(h) intersects all infinite NP sets.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/24/2022

On the existence of strong proof complexity generators

The working conjecture from K'04 that there is a proof complexity genera...
research
04/06/2020

A limitation on the KPT interpolation

We prove a limitation on a variant of the KPT theorem proposed for propo...
research
04/10/2021

Information in propositional proofs and algorithmic proof search

We study from the proof complexity perspective the (informal) proof sear...
research
04/02/2023

Ruling Out Short Proofs of Unprovable Sentences is Hard

If no optimal propositional proof system exists, we (and independently P...
research
11/20/2021

Learning algorithms versus automatability of Frege systems

We connect learning algorithms and algorithms automating proof search in...
research
06/26/2019

A Round-Collapse Theorem for Computationally-Sound Protocols; or, TFNP is Hard (on Average) in Pessiland

Consider the following two fundamental open problems in complexity theor...
research
03/20/2020

Failure of Feasible Disjunction Property for k-DNF Resolution and NP-hardness of Automating It

We show that for every integer k ≥ 2, the Res(k) propositional proof sys...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset