A pre-semantics for counterfactual conditionals and similar logics

12/06/2016
by   Karl Schlechta, et al.
0

The elegant Stalnaker/Lewis semantics for counterfactual conditonals works with distances between models. But human beings certainly have no tables of models and distances in their head. We begin here an investigation using a more realistic picture, based on findings in neuroscience. We call it a pre-semantics, as its meaning is not a description of the world, but of the brain, whose structure is (partly) determined by the world it reasons about. In the final section, we reconsider the components, and postulate that there are no atomic pictures, we can always look inside.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/20/2020

Reasoning about Typicality and Probabilities in Preferential Description Logics

In this work we describe preferential Description Logics of typicality, ...
research
10/06/2019

A Short Remark on Analogical Reasoning

We discuss the problem of defining a logic for analogical reasoning, and...
research
04/28/2023

Causal Modeling Semantics for Counterfactuals with Disjunctive Antecedents

Causal Modeling Semantics (CMS, e.g., Galles and Pearl 1998; Pearl 2000;...
research
06/24/2016

Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning

The semantics for counterfactuals due to David Lewis has been challenged...
research
04/09/2021

Topological semantics for paraconsistent and paracomplete logics in Isabelle/HOL

We encode a topological semantics for paraconsistent and paracomplete lo...
research
07/05/2022

Making sense of spoken plurals

Distributional semantics offers new ways to study the semantics of morph...
research
02/24/2021

Semiparametric counterfactual density estimation

Causal effects are often characterized with averages, which can give an ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset