A potential outcomes approach to selection bias

08/09/2020
by   Eben Kenah, et al.
0

Selection bias occurs when the association between exposure and disease in the study population differs from that in the population eligible for inclusion. Along with confounding, it is one of the fundamental threats to the validity of epidemiologic research. In this paper, we propose a definition of selection bias in terms of potential outcomes. This approach generalizes the structural approach of Hernan et al. (2004), which defines selection bias as a distortion of the exposure-disease association that is caused by conditioning on a collider. Both approaches agree in all situations where the structural approach identifies selection bias, but the potential outcomes approach identifies selection bias in situations where the earlier approach does not. Selection bias defined by potential outcomes can involve a collider at exposure, a collider at disease, or no collider at all. This broader definition of selection bias does not depend on the parameterization of the association between exposure and disease, so it can be analyzed using nonparametric single-world intervention graphs (SWIGs) both under the null hypothesis and away from it. It provides a more nuanced interpretation of the role of randomization in clinical trials, simplifies the analysis of matched studies and case cohort studies, and distinguishes more clearly between the estimation of causal effects within the study population and generalization to the eligible population. This analysis of selection bias is an important theoretical and practical application of SWIGs in epidemiology.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/31/2018

Bounding bias due to selection

When epidemiologic studies are conducted in a subset of the population, ...
research
03/25/2019

Causal inference with multi-state models - estimands and estimators of the population-attributable fraction

The population-attributable fraction (PAF) is a popular epidemiological ...
research
07/22/2023

On Defense of the Hazard Ratio

There has been debate on whether the hazard function should be used for ...
research
03/11/2018

Contextualizing selection bias in Mendelian randomization: how bad is it likely to be?

Selection bias affects Mendelian randomization investigations when selec...
research
03/23/2022

Double Negative Control Inference in Test-Negative Design Studies of Vaccine Effectiveness

The test-negative design (TND) has become a standard approach to evaluat...
research
11/22/2021

Identification of vaccine effects when exposure status is unknown

Results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) help determine vaccinat...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset