A Plausibility Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

07/16/2014
by   Emil Weydert, et al.
0

We propose and investigate a simple ranking-measure-based extension semantics for abstract argumentation frameworks based on their generic instantiation by default knowledge bases and the ranking construction semantics for default reasoning. In this context, we consider the path from structured to logical to shallow semantic instantiations. The resulting well-justified JZ-extension semantics diverges from more traditional approaches.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/31/2023

Ranking-based Argumentation Semantics Applied to Logical Argumentation (full version)

In formal argumentation, a distinction can be made between extension-bas...
research
12/10/2020

Strong Admissibility for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as a formali...
research
05/15/2019

Applying Abstract Argumentation Theory to Cooperative Game Theory

We apply ideas from abstract argumentation theory to study cooperative g...
research
04/30/2014

Compact Argumentation Frameworks

Abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) are one of the most studied form...
research
12/19/2020

On graded semantics of abstract argumentation: Extension-based case

Based on Grossi and Modgil's recent work [1], this paper considers some ...
research
05/02/2014

Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

One of the most prominent tools for abstract argumentation is the Dung's...
research
08/21/2019

Technical Report on Implementing Ranking-Based Semantics in ConArg

ConArg is a suite of tools that offers a wide series of applications for...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset