A paradox in random-effects meta-analysis

12/21/2018
by   Jiandong Shi, et al.
0

This paper reports a new paradox in random-effects meta-analysis. To our knowledge, this paradox has never been reported in the literature on meta-analysis. With the newly discovered paradox, it has been putting us in a dilemma on what final conclusion can be made. We hence advocate meta-analysts to be extremely careful when interpreting the final results from the random-effects meta-analysis, in particular when the number of studies is small and the heterogeneity is large.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/11/2020

Fixed-effects model: the most convincing model for meta-analysis with few studies

According to Davey et al. (2011) with a total of 22,453 meta-analyses fr...
research
06/13/2012

Online open neuroimaging mass meta-analysis

We describe a system for meta-analysis where a wiki stores numerical dat...
research
09/24/2019

Trimmed Constrained Mixed Effects Models: Formulations and Algorithms

Mixed effects (ME) models inform a vast array of problems in the physica...
research
12/03/2022

Accounting for Time Dependency in Meta-Analyses of Concordance Probability Estimates

Recent years have seen the development of many novel scoring tools for d...
research
03/09/2022

Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta-analysis

The variance-stabilizing Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transform was orig...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset