A Note on the Hardness of Problems from Cryptographic Group Actions

02/28/2022
by   Giuseppe D'Alconzo, et al.
0

Given a cryptographic group action, we show that the Group Action Inverse Problem (GAIP) and other related problems cannot be NP-hard unless the Polynomial Hierarchy collapses. We show this via random self-reductions and the design of interactive proofs. Since cryptographic group actions are the building block of many security protocols, this result serves both as an upper bound on the worst-case complexity of some cryptographic assumptions and as proof that the hardness in the worst and in the average case coincide. We also point out the link with Graph Isomorphism and other related NP intermediate problems.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/27/2018

On Basing One-way Permutations on NP-hard Problems under Quantum Reductions

A fundamental pursuit in complexity theory concerns reducing worst-case ...
research
01/04/2023

Cryptographic Group and Semigroup Actions

We consider actions of a group or a semigroup on a set, which generalize...
research
07/28/2022

Hardness of Agnostically Learning Halfspaces from Worst-Case Lattice Problems

We show hardness of improperly learning halfspaces in the agnostic model...
research
09/28/2018

A Candidate Group with Infeasible Inversion

Motivated by the potential cryptographic application of building a direc...
research
11/06/2014

Proof Supplement - Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hard (UAI2013)

This article contains detailed proofs and additional examples related to...
research
09/20/2022

VEST is W[2]-hard

In this short note, we show that the problem of VEST is W[2]-hard for pa...
research
01/12/2023

Hardness of Ruling Out Short Proofs of Kolmogorov Randomness

A meta-complexity assumption, Feasible Chaitin Incompleteness (FCI), ass...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset